- Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives.Hélène Landemore - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1209-1231.details
|
|
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.details
|
|
The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation.David Estlund - 2018 - In André Bächtiger, Jane Mansbridge, John Dryzek & Mark Warren (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.details
|
|
The Wisdom of the Small Crowd: Myside Bias and Group Discussion.Edoardo Baccini, Stephan Hartmann, Rineke Verbrugge & Zoé Christoff - forthcoming - Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation.details
|
|
Virtues and vices – between ethics and epistemology.Nenad Cekić (ed.) - 2023 - Belgrade: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade.details
|
|
Pursuit and inquisitive reasons.Will Fleisher - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 94 (C):17-30.details
|
|
Deliberative democracy - theory and practice: The case of the Belgrade citizens’ assembly.Ivana Jankovic - 2022 - Filozofija I Društvo 33 (1):26-49.details
|
|
Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires that We Practice Hearing Reasons.Daniel H. Cohen - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):711-718.details
|
|
The enigma is not entirely dispelled: A review of Mercier and Sperber's The Enigma of Reason. [REVIEW]Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 2018 - Mind and Language 33 (5):525-532.details
|
|
Empathetic Understanding and Deliberative Democracy.Michael Hannon - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (3):591-611.details
|
|
Por qué fracasa la deliberación y cómo podemos remediarlo. Una alternativa ética al enfoque neurocientífico.Pedro Jesús Pérez Zafrilla - 2017 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 70:131-146.details
|
|
The chronometrics of confirmation bias: Evidence for the inhibition of intuitive judgements.Edward Jn Stupple & Linden J. Ball - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):89-90.details
|
|
What good is moral reasoning?Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Mind and Society 10 (2):131-148.details
|
|
The Problem of Political Polarization and a Way Out of It.Ivan Mladenovic - 2023 - In Nenad Cekić (ed.), Virtues and vices – between ethics and epistemology. Belgrade: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. pp. 265-288.details
|
|
The Myside Bias in Argument Evaluation: A Bayesian Model.Edoardo Baccini & Stephan Hartmann - 2022 - Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 44:1512-1518.details
|
|
Discursive Integrity and the Principles of Responsible Public Debate.Matthew Chrisman - 2022 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 22 (2).details
|
|
Beyond Right Choices: The Art of Wise Decision Making.Mario Graziano - 2024 - Topoi 43 (3):911-922.details
|
|
The Moral Duty Against Dogmatism.Marilie Coetsee - 2022 - The Journal of Ethics 26 (4):563-589.details
|
|
Evolution, cognition and argumentation.Cristian Santibanez Yanez & Michael A. Gilbert - unknowndetails
|
|
On Minimal Deliberation, Partisan Activism, and Teaching People How to Disagree.Hélène Landemore - 2013 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 25 (2):210-225.details
|
|
Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires that We Practice Hearing Reasons.Daniel H. Cohen - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):711-718.details
|
|
In Support of the Weak Rhetoric as Epistemic Thesis. On the Generality and Reliability of Persuasion Knowledge.Frank Zenker - 2013 - In Belle van, P. Gillaerts, B. van Gorp, D. van de Mieroop & K. Rutten (eds.), Verbal and Visual Rhetoric in a Media World. pp. 61-76.details
|
|
Reasoning, robots, and navigation: Dual roles for deductive and abductive reasoning.Janet Wiles - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):92-92.details
|
|
Agente crítico, democracia deliberativa y el acto de dar razones.Cristián Santibáñez - 2020 - Co-herencia 17 (32):37-65.details
|
|
Empathy, not Truth: Can a Dialectical and Skeptical Argumentation Enhance Both Democracy and Human Rights Courts?Alberto Puppo - 2018 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 50 (149):89-117.details
|
|
Truth and Conformity on Networks.Aydin Mohseni & Cole Randall Williams - 2021 - Erkenntnis 86 (6):1509-1530.details
|
|
Public Reflective Equilibrium: A Reply.Avner de Shalit - 2020 - Australasian Philosophical Review 4 (1):87-103.details
|
|
Argumentation: its adaptiveness and efficacy.Hugo Mercier & Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):94-111.details
|
|
Democratic Deliberation and Impartial Justice.Kaisa Herne & Setälä - 2015 - Res Cogitans 10 (1).details
|
|