- Georg Simmel’s Aphorisms.Richard Swedberg & Wendelin Reich - 2010 - Theory, Culture and Society 27 (1):24-51.details
|
|
Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions.Charles A. Kiesler - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):151-152.details
|
|
Should the blinded lead the blinded?Stephen P. Lock - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):156-157.details
|
|
Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?J. Scott Armstrong & Raymond Hubbard - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):136-137.details
|
|
Science, Scientific Careers and Social Exchange in London: The Diary of Herbert McLeod, 1885–1900.Hannah Gay - 2008 - History of Science 46 (4):457.details
|
|
Ethics of Science for Policy in the Environmental Governance of Biotechnology: MON810 Maize in Europe.Fern Wickson & Brian Wynne - 2012 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (3):321 - 340.details
|
|
Patenting and licensing of university research: promoting innovation or undermining academic values?Sigrid Sterckx - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):45-64.details
|
|
China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?Fei Shu, Sichen Liu & Vincent Larivière - 2022 - Minerva 60 (3):329-347.details
|
|
La crítica de la ciencia en España después del 68.Francisco Díaz-Fierros Viqueira - 2019 - Arbor 195 (794):531-531.details
|
|
Responsible Research Is Not Good Science: Divergences Inhibiting the Enactment of RRI in Nanosafety.Lilian van Hove & Fern Wickson - 2017 - NanoEthics 11 (3):213-228.details
|
|
The Evaluation Scale: Exploring Decisions About Societal Impact in Peer Review Panels.Gemma E. Derrick & Gabrielle N. Samuel - 2016 - Minerva 54 (1):75-97.details
|
|
Extensionalism and intensionalism in the realist-SSK ‘debate’.Edward Mariyani-Squire - 2010 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):26-46.details
|
|
Life in the Knowledge Society.Steve Fuller - 1997 - Theory, Culture and Society 14 (1):143-155.details
|
|
Why is the reliability of peer review so low?Donald Laming - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):154-156.details
|
|
Figures de la signature scientifique.David Pontille - 2000 - Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 109:283-316.details
|
|
Responsible technoscience: The haunting reality of auschwitz and hiroshima.Raphael Sassower - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3):277-290.details
|
|
Brazilian political scientists and the Cold War: Soviet hearts, North-American minds.Lidiane Soares Rodrigues - 2020 - Science in Context 33 (2):145-169.details
|
|
Views from the Chalkface.Zhi Hong Wan & Siu Ling Wong - 2016 - Science & Education 25 (9-10):1089-1114.details
|
|
Epistemic Consequences of Bibliometrics-based Evaluation: Insights from the Scientific Community.Tommaso Castellani, Emanuele Pontecorvo & Adriana Valente - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (4):398-419.details
|
|
The isotope effect: Prediction, discussion, and discovery.Helge Kragh - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):176-183.details
|
|
Quantification in Science and Cognition Circa 1937 A Newly Discovered Text of Ludwik Fleck.Ilana Löwy - 1988 - Science in Context 2 (2):345-355.details
|
|
Science Made Up: Constructivist Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.D. Stump - unknowndetails
|
|
Understanding Conceptual Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Policy: The Role of Policymaking Conditions.Jakob Edler, Maria Karaulova & Katharine Barker - 2022 - Minerva 60 (2):209-233.details
|
|
Researchers’ Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study.Tamarinde Haven, H. Roeline Pasman, Guy Widdershoven, Lex Bouter & Joeri Tijdink - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):3017-3036.details
|
|
What Stimulates Researchers to Make Their Research Usable? Towards an ‘Openness’ Approach.Julia Olmos-Peñuela, Paul Benneworth & Elena Castro-Martínez - 2015 - Minerva 53 (4):381-410.details
|
|
Is religious education compatible with science education?Martin Mahner & Mario Bunge - 1996 - Science & Education 5 (2):101-123.details
|
|
Re-taking Care: Open Source Biotech in Light of the Need to Deproletarianize Agricultural Innovation. [REVIEW]Pieter Lemmens - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (1):127-152.details
|
|
Why science's crisis should not become a political battling ground.Andrea Saltelli - 2018 - Futures 104:85-90.details
|
|
Robert K. Merton: The Celebration and Defense of Science.Everett Mendelsohn - 1989 - Science in Context 3 (1):269-289.details
|
|
Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?Patricia Cohen - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):139-140.details
|
|
Public Conceptions of Scientific Consensus.Matthew H. Slater, Joanna K. Huxster & Emily R. Scholfield - 2022 - Erkenntnis 89 (3):1043-1064.details
|
|
El movimiento Open Citations y sus implicaciones en la transformación de la evaluación científica.José Luis Ortega - 2021 - Arbor 197 (799):a592.details
|
|
Do Public Electronic Bulletin Boards Help Create Scientific Knowledge?: The Cold Fusion Case.Bruce V. Lewenstein - 1995 - Science, Technology and Human Values 20 (2):123-149.details
|
|
Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not.Gerald S. Wasserman - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):165-166.details
|
|
Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review.Peter Tyrer - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):164-165.details
|
|
Ethical Assessment and Reflection in Research and Development of Non-Conformité Européene Marked Medical Devices.Patrik K. Telléus & Winnie Jensen - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (4):592-606.details
|
|
Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm.Lawrence J. Stricker - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):163-164.details
|
|
Structural genomics and the organisation of open science.Creso Sá & Merli Tamtik - 2011 - Genomics, Society and Policy 7 (1):1-15.details
|
|
A Science and Technology Studies Challenge to Trustworthiness Criteria: Toward a More Naturalistic Approach.Rahman Sharifzadeh - forthcoming - Philosophy of the Social Sciences.details
|
|
Adam Smith's theory of absolute advantage and the use of doxography in the history of economics.Reinhard Schumacher - 2012 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):54.details
|
|
Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?Kurt Salzinger - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):162-162.details
|
|
Scientific Communication and the Nature of Science.Kristian H. Nielsen - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (9):2067-2086.details
|
|
Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts.Michael J. Mahoney - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):157-157.details
|
|
Why and How: Reflections in an Autobiographical Key.Daniel J. Kevles - 2013 - Science in Context 26 (4):627-638.details
|
|
New Avenues for History in Mathematics Education: Mathematical Competencies and Anchoring.Uffe Thomas Jankvist & Tinne Hoff Kjeldsen - 2011 - Science & Education 20 (9):831-862.details
|
|
Education and scholarship in the twenty-first-century marketplace.Will Roberts Ivan Ascher - 2015 - Contemporary Political Theory 14 (4):409.details
|
|
Scientific Misconduct and Fraud. [REVIEW]Marcel Herbst - 2021 - The European Legacy 27 (1):74-79.details
|
|
Referee agreement in context.Lowell L. Hargens - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):150-151.details
|
|
What should academics do about conspiracy theories? Moving beyond debunking to better deal with conspiratorial movements, misinformation and post-truth.Elżbieta Drążkiewicz Grodzicka & Jaron Harambam - 2021 - Journal for Cultural Research 25 (1):1-11.details
|
|
Is there an alternative to peer review?Richard Greene - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):149-150.details
|
|