Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ethical Concerns of Patients and Family Members Arising During Illness or Medical Care.Marion Danis, Christine Grady, Mariam Noorulhuda, Ben Krohmal, Henry Silverman, Lee Schwab, Hae Lin Cho, Melissa Goldstein & Paul Wakim - 2023 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 14 (4):218-226.
    Patients and family members (N = 671) were surveyed in five Mid-Atlantic U.S. hospitals to ascertain the number and kinds of ethical concerns they are presently experiencing or have previously experienced while being sick or receiving medical care. Seventy percent of participants had at least one (range 0–14) type of ethical concern or question. The most commonly experienced concerns pertained to being unsure how to plan ahead or complete an advance directive (29.4%), being unsure whether someone in the family was (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Antiracist Activism in Clinical Ethics: What's Stopping Us?Holly Vo & Georgina D. Campelia - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (4):34-35.
    Although justice is a central principle in clinical ethics, work that centers social justice is often marginalized in clinical ethics. In addition to institutional barriers that may be preventing clinical ethicists from becoming the activists that Meyers argues we should be, we must also recognize the barriers embedded in the field of clinical ethics itself. As clinical ethicists, we have an opportunity to support anti‐racism work in particular by altering our own organizational structures to be more inclusive and reflective of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Activism and Bioethics: Taking a Stand on Things That Matter.Wendy A. Rogers & Jackie Leach Scully - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (4):32-33.
    The question of whether activism should be overtly embraced as part of the bioethicist's role deserves serious consideration. Like others, we agree that bioethics is inescapably partisan; bioethical deliberation is based on trying to determine morally relevant features of situations and morally justifiable outcomes. Where disagreement arises is over the degree to which bioethicists should be activists. Meyers argues for a somewhat circumscribed role, limited to action on ethically concerning institutional matters, for those who are financially independent of the institutions. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Ethicists’ Deception: Theory, Role, Concepts, and Applications.Christopher Meyers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):W1-W4.
    I am grateful to colleagues for their comments on my target article ; they are almost uniformly insightful, telling, and helpful. In this brief response, I extend the discussion on, in order...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Deception and the Clinical Ethicist.Christopher Meyers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):4-12.
    Lying to one’s patients is wrong. So obvious as to border on a platitude, this truism is one that bioethicists have heartily endorsed for several decades. Deception, the standard line holds, underc...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Why Clinical Ethicists Are Not Activists.Carl Elliott - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (4):36-37.
    Activism is rare among clinical ethicists because the position of ethics consultant is constructed in a way that makes activism very difficult. Clinical ethicists have little formal power and few job protections; they work in organizations in which dissent is discouraged if not punished; and as institutional insiders, they often become blind to the injustices that outsiders protest against.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark