Switch to: References

Citations of:

Using programming concepts in deontic reasoning

In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression. Providence RI, U.S.A.: Foris Publications. pp. 117--145 (1989)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Don’t Ever Do That! Long-term Duties in PD e L.Jesse Hughes & Lambèr M. M. Royakkers - 2008 - Studia Logica 89 (1):59 - 79.
    This paper studies long-term norms concerning actions. In Meyer's Propositional Deontic Logic (PDₑL), only immediate duties can be expressed, however, often one has duties of longer durations such as: "Never do that", or "Do this someday". In this paper, we will investigate how to amend (PDₑL) so that such long-term duties can be expressed. This leads to the interesting and suprising consequence that the long-term prohibition and obligation are not interdefinable in our semantics, while there is a duality between these (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • An integrated framework for ought-to-be and ought-to-do constraints.P. D'Altan, J.-J. Ch Meyer & R. J. Wieringa - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (2):77-111.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Free choice and contextually permitted actions.F. Dignum, J. -J. Ch Meyer & R. J. Wieringa - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (1):193 - 220.
    We present a solution to the paradox of free choice permission by introducing strong and weak permission in a deontic logic of action. It is shown how counterintuitive consequences of strong permission can be avoided by limiting the contexts in which an action can be performed. This is done by introducing the only operator, which allows us to say that only is performed (and nothing else), and by introducing contextual interpretation of action terms.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations