Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Desiring Justice: Motivation and Justification in Rawls and Habermas.Sharon Krause - 2005 - Contemporary Political Theory 4 (4):363-385.
    In seeking to neutralize affectivity and in requiring us to act for the right without reference to the conceptions of the good that normally attract our allegiance, some critics say, contemporary cognitivist theories of justice undercut human agency and leave justice hanging. This paper explores the merits of that charge by engaging the work of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas. Rawls does offer an account of the sense of justice that can meet the motivational challenge, albeit not without compromising the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Recognizing the Passion in Deliberation: Toward a More Democratic Theory of Deliberative Democracy.Cheryl Hall - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (4):81-95.
    Critics have suggested that deliberative democracy reproduces inequalities of gender, race, and class by privileging calm rational discussion over passionate speech and action. Their solution is to supplement deliberation with such forms of emotional expression. Hall argues that deliberation already inherently involves passion, a point that is especially important to recognize in order to deconstruct the dichotomy between reason and passion that plays a central role in reinforcing inequalities of gender, race, and class in the first place.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Recognizing the Passion in Deliberation: Toward a More Democratic Theory of Deliberative Democracy.Cheryl Hall - 2007 - Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 22 (4):81-95.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mastery of Knowledge or Meeting of Subjects? The Epistemic Effects of Two Forms of Political Voice.Emily Beausoleil - 2016 - Contemporary Political Theory 15 (1):16-37.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Desiring Justice: Motivation and Justification in Rawls and Habermas.Sharon Krause - 2005 - Contemporary Political Theory 4 (4):363-385.
    In seeking to neutralize affectivity and in requiring us to act for the right without reference to the conceptions of the good that normally attract our allegiance, some critics say, contemporary cognitivist theories of justice undercut human agency and leave justice hanging. This paper explores the merits of that charge by engaging the work of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas. Rawls does offer an account of the sense of justice that can meet the motivational challenge, albeit not without compromising the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Partisanship and Independence: The Peculiar Moralism of American Politics.Nancy L. Rosenblum - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (3):267-288.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Recognizing the Passion in Deliberation: Toward a More Democratic Theory of Deliberative Democracy.Cheryl Ann Hall - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (4):81-95.
    : Critics have suggested that deliberative democracy reproduces inequalities of gender, race, and class by privileging calm rational discussion over passionate speech and action. Their solution is to supplement deliberation with such forms of emotional expression. Hall argues that deliberation already inherently involves passion, a point that is especially important to recognize in order to deconstruct the dichotomy between reason and passion that plays a central role in reinforcing inequalities of gender, race, and class in the first place.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Realist Liberalism: An Agenda.Andrew Sabl - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (3):366-384.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations