Switch to: References

Citations of:

Health care as a public good

Journal of Social Philosophy 27 (3):14-40 (1996)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care.Angeliki Kerasidou, Antoniya Georgieva & Rachel Dlugatch - 2023 - BMC Medical Ethics 24 (1):1-16.details BackgroundDespite the recognition that developing artificial intelligence (AI) that is trustworthy is necessary for public acceptability and the successful implementation of AI in healthcare contexts, perspectives from key stakeholders are often absent from discourse on the ethical design, development, and deployment of AI. This study explores the perspectives of birth parents and mothers on the introduction of AI-based cardiotocography (CTG) in the context of intrapartum care, focusing on issues pertaining to trust and trustworthiness.MethodsSeventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with birth parents (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 2 citations
An egalitarian politics of care: young female carers and the intersectional inequalities of gender, class and age.Başak Akkan - 2020 - Feminist Theory 21 (1):47-64.details Feminist literature on care has extensively addressed inequalities that cut across the social categories of gender, class and ethnicity in relation to care work. One category that has received less attention in theories of caregiving so far is age. Built on the feminist literature of care and taking young (female) carers as its subject matter, this article tackles age as a third social category of intersectional inequalities along with class and gender. Firstly, through dealing with Nancy Fraser’s justice framework of (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation
Re-envisioning property.Peter Lindsay - 2018 - Contemporary Political Theory 17 (2):187-206.details In our commonplace understanding of property, the “right to exclude” is seen as its central and defining feature: to own is to exclude. This paper examines the cost, to conceptual and normative clarity, of this understanding. First, I argue that the right not to be excluded is a crucial if overlooked element not simply of liberal understandings of ownership, but even of the right to exclude itself. Second, I argue that our neglect of the right not to be excluded severely (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation
Can we own the past? Cultural artifacts as public goods.Peter Lindsay - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (1):1-17.details This paper examines a concrete political controversy in order to shed light on a broad philosophical issue. The controversy is with regard to who owns cultural antiquities ? the nations (often in the developing world) on whose soil they originated, or the museums of developed nations that have, through a variety of means, come into possession of them. Despite their opposing views, both sides accept the claim that ownership can be derived from prior facts about cultural identity. Moreover, when their (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 6 citations

1