Switch to: References

Citations of:

How to grow science

New York: Universe Books (1980)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bias, incompetence, or bad management?John Ziman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):245-246.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reliability and validity of peer review.David Zeaman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):245-245.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Competency testing for reviewers and editors.Rosalyn S. Yalow - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):244-245.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Experimenter and reviewer bias.Joseph C. Witt & Michael J. Hannafin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):243-244.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Research on peer-review practices: Problems of interpretation, application, and propriety.William A. Wilson - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):242-243.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The quandary of manuscript reviewing.Grover J. Whitehurst - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-242.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Some procedural obscurities in Peters and Ceci's peer-review study.Murray J. White - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-241.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscripts.Garth J. Thomas - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):240-240.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • Responsibility in reviewing and research.Sol Tax & Robert A. Rubinstein - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-240.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Referee report on an earlier draft of Peters and Ceci's target article.William A. Scott - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-238.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Anosmic peer review: A rose by another name is evidently not a rose.Sandra Scarr - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):237-238.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review.Donald B. Rubin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):236-237.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • Rejecting published work: Similar fate for fiction.Chuck Ross - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):236-236.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reliability and bias in peer-review practices.Robert Rosenthal - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):235-236.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reviewer reliability: Confusing random error with systematic error or bias.Stanley Presser - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):234-235.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • 2004: A scenario of peer review in the future.Alan L. Porter - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):233-234.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.
    A growing interest in and concern about the adequacy and fairness of modern peer-review practices in publication and funding are apparent across a wide range of scientific disciplines. Although questions about reliability, accountability, reviewer bias, and competence have been raised, there has been very little direct research on these variables.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   192 citations  
  • Peer-review research: Objections and obligations.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):246-255.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reviewer “bias”: Do Peters and Ceci protest too much?Daniel Perlman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):231-232.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Improving research on and policies for peer-review practices.Richard M. Perloff & Robert Perloff - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):232-233.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Biases, decisions and auctorial rebuttal in the peer-review process.David S. Palermo - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):230-231.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What is the source of bias in peer review?Ray Over - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):229-230.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • Reliability, bias, or quality: What is the issue?Katherine Nelson - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):229-229.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Rejecting published work: It couldn't happen in physics! (or could it?).Michael J. Moravcsik - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):228-229.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Designing peer review for the subjective as well as the objective side of science.Ian I. Mitroff - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):227-228.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • When we practice to deceive: The ethics of a metascientific inquiry.Burton Mindick - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):226-227.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Making the plausible implausible: A favorable review of Peters and Ceci's target article.Jason Millman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):225-226.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reform peer review: The Peters and Ceci study in the context of other current studies of scientific evaluation.Clyde Manwell & C. M. Ann Baker - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):221-225.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Publication, politics, and scientific progress.Michael J. Mahoney - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):220-221.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Peer review: Prediction of the future or judgment of the past?Richard T. Louttit - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):219-220.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics.David Lazarus - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):219-219.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected.Michael J. A. Howe - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):218-219.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science.David F. Horrobin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):217-218.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Peer review in the physical sciences: An editor's view.William M. Honig - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):216-217.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The insufficiencies of methodological inadequacy.Robert Hogan - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):216-216.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  • Scientific communication: So where do we go from here?James Hartley - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):215-216.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Judging document content versus social functions of refereeing: Possible and impossible tasks.Belver C. Griffith - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):214-215.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Optional published refereeing.R. A. Gordon - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):213-214.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cognitive relativism and peer-review bias.M. D. Gordon - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):213-213.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • When will the editors start to edit?Leonard D. Goodstein - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):212-213.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • The journal article review process as a game of chance.Norval D. Glenn - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):211-212.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Review bias: Positive or negative, good or bad?Russell G. Geen - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):211-211.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Deception in the study of the peer-review process.Joseph L. Fleiss - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):210-211.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Theoretical implications of failure to detect prepublished submissions.Douglas Lee Eckberg - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):209-210.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • Authorship and manuscript reviewing: The risk of bias.Lois DeBakey - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):208-209.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Editorial responsibilities in manuscript review.Rick Crandall - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):207-208.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Criterion problems in journal review practices.John D. Cone - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):206-207.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias?Andrew M. Colman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):205-206.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us”.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):205-205.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Reforming peer review: From recycling to reflexivity.Daryl E. Chubin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):204-204.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations