Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Gigerenzer's normative critique of Kahneman and Tversky.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2000 - Cognition 76 (3):179-193.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Content-blind norms, no norms, or good norms? A reply to Vranas.Gerd Gigerenzer - 2001 - Cognition 81 (1):93-103.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Epistemic justice and experiential self.V. Hari Narayanan - 2023 - Mind and Society 22 (1):67-85.
    Epistemic injustice is a matter of not doing justice to the knowledge claims of a person, and it is pervasive in our everyday interactions. It can be traced to the susceptibility of the human mind to cognitive biases and distortions. The paper discusses some ways proposed to mitigate epistemic injustice and suggests that this endeavor requires efforts in more dimensions. The paper tries to demonstrate that the existing efforts to combat epistemic injustice need to be complemented by looking into the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and McGraw (1999).Gerd Gigerenzer & Ulrich Hoffrage - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (2):425-430.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • The psychology of the Monty Hall problem: discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser.Stefan Krauss & X. T. Wang - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (1):3.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations