Switch to: References

Citations of:

Rancière and metaphysics

In Gabriel Rockhill & Philip Watts (eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Durham: Duke University Press (2009)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Agonistic Equality in Rancière and Spinoza.Dimitris Vardoulakis - 2016 - Synthesis 9:14-34.
    Jacques Rancière’s conception of equality as an axiomatic presupposition of the political is important, because it bypasses the tradition which defines equality in terms of Aristotle’s conception of geometric equality. In this paper, I show that Rancière’s theory both espouses a monism, according to which inequality implies equality, and relies on a concept of the free will, which is incompatible with monism. I highlight this tension by bringing Rancière’s theory into conversation with the great monist of the philosophical tradition, Baruch (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Tunisia and the Critical Legal Theory of Dissensus.Illan Rua Wall - 2012 - Law and Critique 23 (3):219-236.
    Schmitt insists that the sovereign decision is unavoidable, that even an anarchist is caught in the trap of sovereignty when he tries to ‘decide against decision’. This article begins to think about a critical legal vocabulary that might suspend the necessity of the will to constitute, while emphasising the creativity of the constituent moment. The terms inoperativity, dis-enclosure and dissensus are developed and deployed in order to think about certain aspects of the Tunisian revolution. In particular, the article focuses upon (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Art and the Heideggerian Repression: Ranciére, Nancy, and a Communism of the Image.Michael Eng - 2013 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 5 (1):19-35.
    This essay conducts a reading of Jean-Luc Nancy’s and Jacques Rancière’s respective theorizations of the image. Using Nancy’s notion of literary communism, I first show how he and Rancière conceive the image as a site of community’s open writing and contestation. My reading then demonstrates how this “communism of the image” exposes Rancière’s repetition of an ontological gesture that he has attempted to dismiss as Heideggerian.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark