Switch to: References

Citations of:

Was ist Religion?

Insel (1986)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Place: Derrida and Nishitani.Rolf Elberfeld - 2020 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 12 (1):44-52.
    In his works Chora [Derrida, Jacques. 1993. Khôra. Paris: Galilée] and “Comment ne pas parler? Denegations” Derrida used the metaphor chora from Plato’s Timaeus (49a and following) to continue his struggle with the metaphysics of presence. In 1926 Nishida, the founder of the Japanese Kyōto School, used the same metaphor to create a new foundation of philosophy. Nishitani, a disciple of Nishida, developed the work of Nishida in close connection to Zen Buddhist experiences. Derrida tries to show the limits of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Report: Tracing the Tracks of the Journal of Japanese Philosophy and the International Association for Japanese Philosophy.John Krummel & Mayuko Uehara - 2019 - Tetsugaku 3:38-46.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Anselms Proslogion, “nichts” gegen Nishida und Heidegger.Manfred Gawlina - 2013 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 3 (2):285-300.
    Co jest większe, bycie czy nic? Anzelm dowodzi istnienia Boga przy pomocy nihil. Bóg jako to, od czego nic większego nie może zostać pomyślane przez skończony umysł. Właściwe dla Anzelma logiczne – i być może mistyczne – użycie słowa „nic” domaga się porównania z negatywną ontologią Heideggera i jej recepcją w ramach tzw. Szkoły z Kioto założonej przez Nishidę. Czyż jednak pustka buddyzmu zen nie odsyła nas do – niewypowiedzianej – boskiej obecności?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The kyoto school.Bret W. Davis - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Is There a Human Right to Freedom of Religion?Paul Tiedemann - 2015 - Human Rights Review 16 (2):83-98.
    A human right to freedom of religion is not equivalent to a right to tolerance. Human rights and tolerance-rules serve for different purposes and are based on different justifications. Tolerance-rules serve to protect a peaceful living together with strangers who share no common values. Human rights serve to protect every individual’s personhood. Religion can only be a matter of human rights, if and so far as it is a condition of development and maintenance of personhood. Discussion about a human right (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Sobre o niilismo e o vazio - Nishitani e Heidegger.Katsuya Akitomi - 2011 - Natureza Humana 13 (2):1-18.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark