- Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.details
|
|
The informal use of Reductio ad Absurdum.Henrike Jansen - unknowndetails
|
|
Perelman, Informal Logic and the Historicity of Reason.Christopher W. Tindale - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (3):341-357.details
|
|
Professor Fisher on suppositions.George Bowles - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (3):237-246.details
|
|
Evaluating Dialectical Structures.Gregor Betz - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):283-312.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Rise of Informal Logic: Essays on Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Reasoning, and Politics.Ralph Henry Johnson - 1996 - Newport, VA, USA: Vale Press. Edited by J. Anthony Blair, Trudy Govier, Leo Groarke, John Hoaglund & Christopher W. Tindale.details
|
|
Refuting a Standpoint by Appealing to Its Outcomes: Reductio ad Absurdum vs. Argument from Consequences.Henrike Jansen - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (3):249-266.details
|
|
Argument structure: representation and theory.James B. Freeman - 2011 - New York: Springer.details
|
|
State-of-the-Art: The Structure of Argumentation. [REVIEW]A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (4):447-473.details
|
|
Affirming the consequent.George Bowles - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (4):429-444.details
|
|
Walton's Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation.James B. Freeman - 1990 - Informal Logic 12 (2).details
|
|
Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective.James B. Freeman - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):397-423.details
|
|