Switch to: References

Citations of:

Copernicus, Ptolemy, and explanatory coherence

In R. Giere & H. Feigl (eds.), Cognitive Models of Science. University of Minnesota Press. pp. pp. 274-309 (1992)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How do medical researchers make causal inferences?Olaf Dammann, Ted Poston & Paul Thagard - 2019 - In Kevin McCain (ed.), What is Scientific Knowledge?: An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology of Science. New York: Routledge.
    Bradford Hill (1965) highlighted nine aspects of the complex evidential situation a medical researcher faces when determining whether a causal relation exists between a disease and various conditions associated with it. These aspects are widely cited in the literature on epidemiological inference as justifying an inference to a causal claim, but the epistemological basis of the Hill aspects is not understood. We offer an explanatory coherentist interpretation, explicated by Thagard's ECHO model of explanatory coherence. The ECHO model captures the complexity (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Coherence: Beyond constraint satisfaction.Gareth Gabrys & Alan Lesgold - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):475-475.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Acceptability, analogy, and the acceptability of analogies.Robert N. McCauley - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):482-483.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What does explanatory coherence explain?Ronald N. Giere - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):475-476.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Explanatory coherence (plus commentary).Paul Thagard - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):435-467.
    This target article presents a new computational theory of explanatory coherence that applies to the acceptance and rejection of scientific hypotheses as well as to reasoning in everyday life, The theory consists of seven principles that establish relations of local coherence between a hypothesis and other propositions. A hypothesis coheres with propositions that it explains, or that explain it, or that participate with it in explaining other propositions, or that offer analogous explanations. Propositions are incoherent with each other if they (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   226 citations  
  • Deliberative coherence.Elijah Millgram & Paul Thagard - 1996 - Synthese 108 (1):63 - 88.
    Choosing the right plan is often choosing the more coherent plan: but what is coherence? We argue that coherence-directed practical inference ought to be represented computationally. To that end, we advance a theory of deliberative coherence, and describe its implementation in a program modelled on Thagard's ECHO. We explain how the theory can be tested and extended, and consider its bearing on instrumentalist accounts of practical rationality.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Extending explanatory coherence.Paul Thagard - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):490-502.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Texting ECHO on historical data.Jan M. Zytkow - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):489-490.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • ECHO and STAHL: On the theory of combustion.Herbert A. Simon - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):487-487.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Inference to the best explanation is basic.John R. Josephson - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):477-478.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • New science for old.Bruce Mangan & Stephen Palmer - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):480-482.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Computation, coherence, and ethical reasoning.Marcello Guarini - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (1):27-46.
    Theories of moral, and more generally, practical reasoning sometimes draw on the notion of coherence. Admirably, Paul Thagard has attempted to give a computationally detailed account of the kind of coherence involved in practical reasoning, claiming that it will help overcome problems in foundationalist approaches to ethics. The arguments herein rebut the alleged role of coherence in practical reasoning endorsed by Thagard. While there are some general lessons to be learned from the preceding, no attempt is made to argue against (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Theory autonomy and future promise.Matti Sintonen - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):488-488.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Are explanatory coherence and a connectionist model necessary?Jerry R. Hobbs - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):476-477.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • On the testability of ECHO.D. C. Earle - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):474-474.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Explanatory coherence in neural networks?Daniel S. Levine - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):479-479.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Changing minds about climate change: Belief revision, coherence, and emotion.Paul Thagard & Scott Findlay - 2011 - In Erik J. Olson Sebastian Enqvist (ed.), Belief Revision meets Philosophy of Science. Springer. pp. 329--345.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • An explanatory coherence model of decision making in ill-structured problems.M. Laura Frigotto & Alessandro Rossi - 2015 - Mind and Society 14 (1):35-55.
    Classical models of decision making deal fairly well with uncertainty, where settings are well-structured in terms of goals, alternatives, and consequences. Conversely, the typical ill-structured nature of strategy choices remains a challenge for extant models. Such cases can hardly build on the past, and their novelty makes the prediction of consequences a very difficult and poorly robust task. The weakness of the classical expected utility model in representing such problems has not been adequately solved by recent extensions. In this paper (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What's in a link?Jerome A. Feldman - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):474-475.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Does ECHO explain explanation? A psychological perspective.Joshua Klayman & Robin M. Hogarth - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):478-479.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Two problems for the explanatory coherence theory of acceptability.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):471-471.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Optimization and connectionism are two different things.Drew McDermott - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):483-484.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Coherence and abduction.Paul O'Rorke - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):484-484.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Psychology, or sociology of science?N. E. Wetherick - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):489-489.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Explanation and acceptability.Peter Achinstein - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):467-468.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Assimilating evidence: The key to revision?Michelene T. H. Chi - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):470-471.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Conceptual Revolutions? How Not to Naturalize the Philosophy of Science.Don Ross - 1996 - Dialogue 35 (1):147-154.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Measuring the plausibility of explanatory hypotheses.James A. Reggia - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):486-487.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Explanatory coherence in understanding persons, interactions, and relationships.Stephen J. Read & Lynn C. Miller - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):485-486.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Probability and normativity.David Papineau - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):484-485.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Explanationism, ECHO, and the connectionist paradigm.William G. Lycan - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):480-480.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Thagard's Principle 7 and Simpson's paradox.Robyn M. Dawes - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):472-473.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Explanatory coherence as a psychological theory.P. C.-H. Cheng & M. Keane - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):469-470.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • When weak explanations prevail.Carl Bereiter & Marlene Scardamalia - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):468-469.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark