Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo‐Logicism.Fraser MacBride - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):103-163.
    According to the species of neo-logicism advanced by Hale and Wright, mathematical knowledge is essentially logical knowledge. Their view is found to be best understood as a set of related though independent theses: (1) neo-fregeanism-a general conception of the relation between language and reality; (2) the method of abstraction-a particular method for introducing concepts into language; (3) the scope of logic-second-order logic is logic. The criticisms of Boolos, Dummett, Field and Quine (amongst others) of these theses are explicated and assessed. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  • (1 other version)Strategies for a logic of plurals.Alex Oliver & Timothy Smiley - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):289-306.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • Boolos on the justification of set theory.Alexander Paseau - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):30-53.
    George Boolos has argued that the iterative conception of set justifies most, but not all, the ZFC axioms, and that a second conception of set, the Frege-von Neumann conception (FN), justifies the remaining axioms. This article challenges Boolos's claim that FN does better than the iterative conception at justifying the axioms in question.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • What are sets and what are they for?Alex Oliver & Timothy Smiley - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):123–155.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)Strategies for a Logic of Plurals.Timothy Smiley Alex Oliver - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):289-306.
    English has plural terms as well as singular terms. But our standard formal languages, e.g., the predicate calculus, feature only singular terms. How can the plural idiom be formalized?‘Changing the subject’ is by far the most common plurals strategy among both philosophers and linguists: a plural term is replaced by a singular term standing for some complex object that ‘contains’ the individuals to which the plural term alludes. For example, one might simply replace ‘A, B imply C’ with ‘{A, B} (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations