Citations of:
Add citations
You must login to add citations.
|
|
This paper compares the doxastic credentials of the claim that nothing comes from nothing with the doxastic credentials of the claim that there is no causing without changing. I argue that comparison of these two claims supports my contention that considerations about causation do nothing to make theism more attractive than naturalism. |
|
Many commentators have accused Aquinas of committing either a formal or an informal fallacy in his Third Way argument. I believe it is possible to revise the Third Way argument so as to avoid such errors. I here present a revision of the first part of the Third Way that is immune to the objections most commonly raised against it, consonant with the basic tenets of Thomism, and plausible from a contemporary point of view. |