Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Textual artefacts at the centre of sensemaking: The use of discursive-material resources in constructing joint understanding in organisational workshops.Pekka Pälli & Riikka Nissi - 2020 - Discourse Studies 22 (2):123-145.
    The article examines the role of discourse in organisational sensemaking. By building links between the theorising undertaken within organisational studies and the empirical analysis of multimodal social interaction, it argues for a relational view of sensemaking and investigates how sense is made in and through social interaction in real organisational situations where language use intertwines with embodied actions and the manipulation of artefacts. In particular, the article studies the use of discourse technologies of textual artefacts in sensemaking processes. The data (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mapping the epistemic landscape in innovation workshops.Jeanette Landgrebe & Trine Heinemann - 2014 - Pragmatics and Society 5 (2):191-220.
    This article addresses the epistemic domain of adult make-believe activities in innovation workshops. In particular, we demonstrate how adults initiate imaginary transformations of objects while displaying an orientation to a general order of make-believe in which everyone has equal epistemic rights, and how this can be displayed both verbally and nonverbally. This distribution of equal rights is only overridden by external or locally derived roles, and once invoked they override the general preference for epistemic symmetry, after which interlocutors orient to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Spelling out consequences: Conditional constructions as a means to resist proposals in organisational planning process.Riikka Nissi - 2016 - Discourse Studies 18 (3):311-329.
    Organisational planning processes often materialise as a series of meetings, where the future of the organisation is jointly discussed and negotiated as a part of local decision-making sequences. Using conversation and discourse analytical approaches, this article investigates how proposals concerning the future can also be resisted by employing a specific device, a conditional construction. The data for the study originate from a city organisation, whose customer services are being developed. The results show how the conditional constructions work in two interrelated (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Coordinating talk and practical action: The case of hair salon service assessments.Sae Oshima & Jürgen Streeck - 2015 - Pragmatics and Society 6 (4):538-564.
    This paper investigates how talk and practical action are coordinated during one type of activity involving professional communication: the service-­assessment sequence in hair salons. During this activity, a practical inspection of the haircut must be coupled with sequentially produced verbal acts. Our analysis of four examples reveals that there is no fixed relationship between the organization of talk and practical action. Instead, people manipulate this relationship on a moment-by-moment basis, often coordinating the two into a single, integral package, or relying (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • ‘We don’t need to abide by that!’: Negotiating professional roles in problem-solving talk at work.Jo Angouri & Kyoungmi Kim - 2019 - Discourse and Communication 13 (2):172-191.
    In this article, we focus on problem solving talk in the business meeting event. We zoom in on the processes of formulating, negotiating and ratifying an issue as a problem, and we argue that individuals negotiate their stances in relation to their perceived/projected professional roles. The processes of problem-solving are, simultaneously, processes of self/other positioning. We take an Interactional Sociolinguistic perspective and draw on audio-recorded meeting talk collected in a multinational corporate workplace. Our analysis shows that interactants draw on issues (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Constructing and negotiating the professional identity of ‘leader’ by suggesting and challenging improvement of professional practices: Deontics in a four-part sequential structure.Mie Femø Nielsen, Brian L. Due & Louise Tranekjær - 2022 - Discourse Studies 24 (5):640-661.
    The paper contributes to previous studies of identity as locally and interactionally produced by pointing to some of the multimodal resources employed by participants to achieving, challenge and manage the professional identity of ‘leader’ in different workplace settings. We examine professional identity work in sequential environments where it provides a resource for handling the resistance to improvement displayed by another participant. We show how leader identity work gets embedded within a four-part structure of: identifying a problem, proposing improvements, misaligning with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Do we X, Should/Shall we X, Let’s X.Robin Sokol - 2019 - Interaction Studies 20 (2):339-361.
    This article studies the formats Do we X, Should/Shall we X, and Let’s X in order to deepen our understanding of face-to-face collaborative interactions at the computer. We use 6 hours of data of university students collaborating in British and American English, and our methodology is Conversation Analysis. We demonstrate that the participants display and orient to the immediacy/remoteness of the task, as well as their entitlement to carry out the proposed task, when they put forward a proposed action. To (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Exploring distributed leadership: Solving disagreements and negotiating consensus in a ‘leaderless’ team.Stephanie Schnurr & Seongsook Choi - 2014 - Discourse Studies 16 (1):3-24.
    This article explores how leadership is done in a ‘leaderless’ team. Drawing on a corpus of more than 120 hours of audio-recorded meetings of different interdisciplinary research groups and using a discourse analytic framework and tools, we examine how leadership is enacted in a team that does not have an assigned leader or chair. Our specific focus is the discursive processes through which team members conjointly solve disagreements and negotiate consensus – which are two activities associated with leadership. More specifically, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation