Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. An axiomatic approach to CG′3 logic.Miguel Pérez-Gaspar, Alejandro Hernández-Tello, José Arrazola Ramírez & Mauricio Osorio Galindo - 2020 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 28 (6):1218-1232.
    In memoriam José Arrazola Ramírez The logic $\textbf{G}^{\prime}_3$ was introduced by Osorio et al. in 2008; it is a three-valued logic, closely related to the paraconsistent logic $\textbf{CG}^{\prime}_3$ introduced by Osorio et al. in 2014. The logic $\textbf{CG}^{\prime}_3$ is defined in terms of a multi-valued semantics and has the property that each theorem in $\textbf{G}^{\prime}_3$ is a theorem in $\textbf{CG}^{\prime}_3$. Kripke-type semantics has been given to $\textbf{CG}^{\prime}_3$ in two different ways by Borja et al. in 2016. In this work, we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Equivalence among RC-type paraconsistent logics.Mauricio Osorio & José Abel Castellanos Joo - 2017 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 25 (2):239-252.
    In this article we review several paraconsistent logics from different authors to ‘close the gaps’ between them. Since paraconsistent logics is a broad area of research, it is possible that equivalent paraconsistent logics have different names. What we meant is that we provide connections between the logics studied comparing their different semantical approaches for a near future be able to obtain missing semantical characterization of different logics. We are introducing the term RC-type logics to denote a class of logics that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Pursuit of an Implication for the Logics L3A and L3B.Alejandro Hernández-Tello, José Arrazola Ramírez & Mauricio Osorio Galindo - 2017 - Logica Universalis 11 (4):507-524.
    The authors of Beziau and Franceschetto work with logics that have the property of not satisfying any of the formulations of the principle of non contradiction, Béziau and Franceschetto also analyze, among the three-valued logics, which of these logics satisfy this property. They prove that there exist only four of such logics, but only two of them are worthwhile to study. The language of these logics does not consider implication as a connective. However, the enrichment of a language with an (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations