Switch to: References

Citations of:

Illocutionary negation

Philosophia 8 (4):639-644 (1979)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The pragmatic aspects of linguistic negation: Speech act, argumentation and pragmatic inference. [REVIEW]Jacques Mœschler - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (1):51-76.
    This paper is an attempt to give a general explanation of pragmatic aspects of linguistic negation. After a brief survey of classical accounts of negation within pragmatic theories (as speech act theory, argumentation theory and polyphonic theory), the main pragmatic uses of negation (illocutionary negation, external negation, lowering and majoring negation) are discussed within relevance theory. The question of the relevance of negative utterance is raised, and a general inferential schema (based on the so-called invited inference) is proposed and tested (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Do illocutionary, or neustic, negations exist?Hans-Ulrich Hoche - 1995 - Erkenntnis 43 (1):127 - 136.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • New foundations for imperative logic I: Logical connectives, consistency, and quantifiers.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2008 - Noûs 42 (4):529-572.
    Imperatives cannot be true or false, so they are shunned by logicians. And yet imperatives can be combined by logical connectives: "kiss me and hug me" is the conjunction of "kiss me" with "hug me". This example may suggest that declarative and imperative logic are isomorphic: just as the conjunction of two declaratives is true exactly if both conjuncts are true, the conjunction of two imperatives is satisfied exactly if both conjuncts are satisfied—what more is there to say? Much more, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • The mode of existence of illocutionary negation.Savas L. Tsohatzidis - 2001 - Erkenntnis 54 (2):205-214.
    This paper examines a recent attempt to provide a negative answer to the question of the existence of illocutionary negations. It argues that the attempt is unsuccessful both because it presupposes a misinterpretation of the question's theoretical import and because, even granting that misinterpretation, it bases its proposed answer on certain assumptions that can independently be shown to be untenable.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark