Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Chaïm Perelman: Justice, argumentation and ancient rhetoric. [REVIEW]Alonso Tordesillas - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (1):109-124.
    Theoretical interest in Perelman's thought is linked, for the main part, to the place he accords to the notion of argumentation, defined in his work in reference to the Greek philosophy, as represented by Plato and Aristotle, in contrast to the assertions of the sophists and rhetors. He separates the notion of demonstration and that of argumentation and supports his position on an analysis of the debates which were common in the sophistic and rhetoric period.It is in different ways that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Eugene Dupreel and Chaim Perelman: the normative and critical principles of the “rhetorical turn” in contemporary philosophy. Part II.Sergii Secundant - 2023 - Sententiae 42 (1):37-68.
    The purpose of the article is, firstly, to explicate and give a critical assessment of the methodological, epistemological, and philosophical foundations that led to the “rhetorical turn” in modern philosophy, and, secondly, to answer the question of how justified the grounds for such a “rhetorical turn” are. The answer proposed is based on a reconstruction of Eugene Dupréel’s critical arguments that were directed against the “classical philosophy” and their reception in Chaim Perelman’s works during his “turning point” period (1947 – (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Persuasion, Rhetoric and Authority.Luca Maria Scarantino - 2008 - Diogenes 55 (1):22-36.
    The author argues that the persuasive process is articulated within a dynamic linking beliefs and emotions. The different possible states of equilibrium balancing these two aspects define a persuasive process as more inherently rational or more inherently rhetorical. This latter, being marked by an immediate emotional participation, functions within a social context of the community type. It is dominated by an aesthetic form of communication, where epistemic belief proceeds out of a conformist adherence to the ethos of the group. Its (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Pierre de La Ramée et le déclin de la rhétorique.C. Perelman - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (4):347-356.
    This article provides a basic general introduction to Ramus, and evaluates his role in the history of logic and rhetoric, especially with relation to the study of argumentation. The author agrees with Ong and other historians of logic that Ramus is not to be taken seriously as a logician, and that his undoubted importance in the history of ideas is to be found elsewhere.Ramus advocates a belief in nature, experience and reason, and rejects the reliance on the authority of ancient (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Persuasion, Rhetoric and Authority.Maria Scarantino Luca - 2008 - Diogenes 55 (1):22-36.
    The author argues that the persuasive process is articulated within a dynamic linking beliefs and emotions. The different possible states of equilibrium balancing these two aspects define a persuasive process as more inherently rational or more inherently rhetorical. This latter, being marked by an immediate emotional participation, functions within a social context of the community type. It is dominated by an aesthetic form of communication, where epistemic belief proceeds out of a conformist adherence to the ethos of the group. Its (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Transcendence, truth, and argumentation.Tim6 Heysse - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):411 – 434.
    According to Thomas Nagel we have a natural impulse to transcend our personal point of view. However, it appears to be difficult to give this notion of transcendence any real content while maintaining a connection with everyday speech and behaviour. In this essay I show that the description of what happens in a discussion when a speaker convinces a listener suggests an interesting interpretation of transcendence. The notion of 'truth' linked to the listener who is being convinced introduces a normative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Aristotelism of Difference.Jesús de Garay - 2008 - Foundations of Science 13 (3-4):229-237.
    There is a central doctrine in Aristotle that usually isn’t recognized in its importance: the affirmation of the difference and the plurality. In the course of the centuries, Aristotelism lost which was perhaps its most characteristic and specific feature versus Platonism, that is, its criticism of unity and its defense of plurality. The first principle is not the One but the plurality. The horizon of thinking is not the unity but the diversity of the logos. The unity of the logos (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Self-Evidence and Proof.C. H. Perelman - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (127):289 - 302.
    There is an argument, well known in the history of philosophy, which makes all knowledge ultimately depend on some kind of intuitive or sensory immediacy. According to this argument, either the proposition itself is self–evident; 2 or else it can be shown to follow, with the help of a chain of intermediate links, from other propositions which are self–evident. Moreover, it is this self–evidence of immediate knowledge and only this which, again speaking traditionally, sufficiently guarantees the truth of the affirmations (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Filosofía y retórica en Chaim Perelman: el auditorio universal razonable.Mauricio Beuchot - 1994 - Endoxa 1 (3):301.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • La naturaleza dialéctica del libro III de la "Metafísica" a la luz de los "Tópicos".Javier Aguirre - 2017 - Revista de Filosofía 42 (2):163-172.
    En el artículo se analiza la naturaleza dialéctica del libro III de la Metafísica de Aristóteles a la luz del contenido, procedimiento y utilidad del método dialéctico expuestos por el Estagirita en los Tópicos.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark