Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Weak Indestructibility and Reflection.James Holland - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-27.
    We establish an equiconsistency between (1) weak indestructibility for all $\kappa +2$ -degrees of strength for cardinals $\kappa $ in the presence of a proper class of strong cardinals, and (2) a proper class of cardinals that are strong reflecting strongs. We in fact get weak indestructibility for degrees of strength far beyond $\kappa +2$, well beyond the next inaccessible limit of measurables (of the ground model). One direction is proven using forcing and the other using core model techniques from (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Weak saturation properties and side conditions.Monroe Eskew - 2024 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 175 (1):103356.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The consistency strength of the perfect set property for universally baire sets of reals.Ralf Schindler & Trevor M. Wilson - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (2):508-526.
    We show that the statement “every universally Baire set of reals has the perfect set property” is equiconsistent modulo ZFC with the existence of a cardinal that we call virtually Shelah for supercompactness. These cardinals resemble Shelah cardinals and Shelah-for-supercompactness cardinals but are much weaker: if $0^\sharp $ exists then every Silver indiscernible is VSS in L. We also show that the statement $\operatorname {\mathrm {uB}} = {\boldsymbol {\Delta }}^1_2$, where $\operatorname {\mathrm {uB}}$ is the pointclass of all universally Baire (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Woodin for strong compactness cardinals.Stamatis Dimopoulos - 2019 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (1):301-319.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On extensions of supercompactness.Robert S. Lubarsky & Norman Lewis Perlmutter - 2015 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 61 (3):217-223.
    We show that, in terms of both implication and consistency strength, an extendible with a larger strong cardinal is stronger than an enhanced supercompact, which is itself stronger than a hypercompact, which is itself weaker than an extendible. All of these are easily seen to be stronger than a supercompact. We also study Cn‐supercompactness.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation