Switch to: References

Citations of:

Selected Writings

University of Chicago Press (1981)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. An Interpretation of the Continuous Adaptation of the Self/Environment Process.Chris Francovich - 2010 - The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 3 (5):307-322.
    Insights into the nondual relationship of organism and environment and their processual nature have resulted in numerous efforts at understanding human behavior and motivation from a holistic and contextual perspective. Meadian social theory, cultural historical activity theory (CHAT), ecological psychology, and some interpretations of complexity theory persist in relating human activity to the wider and more scientifically valid view that a process metaphysics suggests. I would like to articulate a concept from ecological psychology – that of the affordance, and relate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mead, Intersubjectivity, and Education: The Early Writings. [REVIEW]Gert J. J. Biesta - 1998 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3):73-99.
    This article seeks to reconstruct the early writings of George Herbert Mead in order to explore the significance of his work for the development of an intersubjective conception of education. The reconstruction takes its point of departure in Mead's claim that reflective consciousness has a social situation as its precondition. In a mainly chronological account of Mead's writings on psychology and philosophy from the period 1900–1925, it is shown how Mead explains the social origin of conscious reflection and self-consciousness. It (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Child, philosophy and education:discussing the intellectual sources of Philosophy for Children.Hannu Juuso - unknown
    The study analyzes the theoretical basis of the Philosophy for Children (P4C) program elaborated by Matthew Lipman. The aim is, firstly, to identify the main philosophical and pedagogical principles of P4C based on American pragmatism, and to locate their pedagogization and possible problems in Lipman’s thinking. Here the discussion is especially targeted to the thinking of John Dewey and George H. Mead as well as Lev Vygotsky, whom Lipman himself names as the most pivotal sources for his own thinking. On (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations