Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): is routinization problematic?Aviad Raz, Daniëlle R. M. Timmermans & Christoph Rehmann-Sutter - 2023 - BMC Medical Ethics 24 (1):1-11.
    BackgroundThe introduction and wide application of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has triggered further evolution of routines in the practice of prenatal diagnosis. ‘Routinization’ of prenatal diagnosis however has been associated with hampered informed choice and eugenic attitudes or outcomes. It is viewed, at least in some countries, with great suspicion in both bioethics and public discourse. However, it is a heterogeneous phenomenon that needs to be scrutinized in the wider context of social practices of reproductive genetics. In different countries with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ethische Aspekte der Präimplantationsdiagnostik – Einblick in die Arbeit der Bayerischen Ethikkommission.Arne Manzeschke & Orsolya Friedrich - 2023 - Ethik in der Medizin 35 (4):559-574.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for “Non-Medical” Traits: Ensuring Consistency in Ethical Decision-Making.Hilary Bowman-Smart, Christopher Gyngell, Cara Mand, David J. Amor, Martin B. Delatycki & Julian Savulescu - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (3):3-20.
    The scope of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) could expand in the future to include detailed analysis of the fetal genome. This will allow for the testing for virtually any trait with a genetic contribution, including “non-medical” traits. Here we discuss the potential use of NIPT for these traits. We outline a scenario which highlights possible inconsistencies with ethical decision-making. We then discuss the case against permitting these uses. The objections include practical problems; increasing inequities; increasing the burden of choice; negative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • „Selektive“ Fortpflanzung durch pränatale Diagnostik?Christoph Rehmann-Sutter - 2021 - Ethik in der Medizin 34 (1):7-26.
    Die breite Einführung nicht-invasiver pränataler Tests sowie die Ausweitung der Testziele über Trisomien hinaus machen es notwendig, Sinn und Ziel der pränatalen Diagnostik als emergente soziale Praxis grundsätzlich zu diskutieren. Wenn, wie angenommen wird, PND nicht zu eugenischen Zwecken, sondern zur Stärkung der Autonomie dienen soll, muss gefragt werden, welche Bedeutung die Entscheidungen haben, ein bestimmtes zukünftiges Kind zu gebären. Stephen Wilkinson hat vorgeschlagen, PND als eine Form „selektiver Reproduktion“ zu verstehen. In diesem Paper wird geprüft, ob die Charakterisierung der (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Comparing Germany and Israel regarding debates on policy-making at the beginning of life: PGD, NIPT and their paths of routinization.Aviad E. Raz, Tamar Nov-Klaiman, Yael Hashiloni-Dolev, Hannes Foth, Christina Schües & Christoph Rehmann-Sutter - 2021 - Ethik in der Medizin 34 (1):65-80.
    The routinization of prenatal diagnosis is the source of bioethical and policy debates regarding choice, autonomy, access, and protection. To understand these debates in the context of cultural diversity and moral pluralism, we compare Israel and Germany, focusing on two recent repro-genetic “hot spots” of such policy-making at the beginning of life: pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and non-invasive prenatal genetic testing, two cutting-edge repro-genetic technologies that are regulated and viewed very differently in Germany and Israel, reflecting different medicolegal policies as well (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation