Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Faster Teaching via POMDP Planning.Anna N. Rafferty, Emma Brunskill, Thomas L. Griffiths & Patrick Shafto - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (6):1290-1332.
    Human and automated tutors attempt to choose pedagogical activities that will maximize student learning, informed by their estimates of the student's current knowledge. There has been substantial research on tracking and modeling student learning, but significantly less attention on how to plan teaching actions and how the assumed student model impacts the resulting plans. We frame the problem of optimally selecting teaching actions using a decision-theoretic approach and show how to formulate teaching as a partially observable Markov decision process planning (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Resampling of hypotheses after negative instances.Irwin D. Nahinsky, Rebecca L. Hollyfield & David E. Oeschger - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (5):520-522.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mindset changes lead to drastic impairments in rule finding.Hadas ErEl & Nachshon Meiran - 2011 - Cognition 119 (2):149-165.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Integrated Learning: Controlling Explanation.Michael Lebowitz - 1986 - Cognitive Science 10 (2):219-240.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.Robert M. Nosofsky, Thomas J. Palmeri & Stephen C. McKinley - 1994 - Psychological Review 101 (1):53-79.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   126 citations  
  • Hoist by its own petard: The ironic and fatal flaws of dual-process theory.David E. Melnikoff & John A. Bargh - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e132.
    By stipulating the existence of a system 1 and a system 2, dual-process theories raise questions about how these systems function. De Neys identifies several such questions for which no plausible answers have ever been offered. What makes the nature of systems 1 and 2 so difficult to ascertain? The answer is simple: The systems do not exist.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Effect of Feedback on Attention Allocation in Category Learning: An Eye Tracking Study.Yael Arbel, Emily Feeley & Xinyi He - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why Higher Working Memory Capacity May Help You Learn: Sampling, Search, and Degrees of Approximation.Kevin Lloyd, Adam Sanborn, David Leslie & Stephan Lewandowsky - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (12):e12805.
    Algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference, such as those based on sampling (i.e., Monte Carlo methods), provide a natural source of models of how people may deal with uncertainty with limited cognitive resources. Here, we consider the idea that individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) may be usefully modeled in terms of the number of samples, or “particles,” available to perform inference. To test this idea, we focus on two recent experiments that report positive associations between WMC and two distinct (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation