Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ernst Mally's Deontik (1926).Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (2):273-282.
    In 1926, Mally proposed the first formal deontic system. As Mally and others soon realized, this system had some rather strange consequences. We show that the strangeness of Mally's system is not so much due to Mally's informal deontic principles as to the fact that he formalized those principles in terms of the propositional calculus. If they are formalized in terms of relevant logic rather than classical logic, one obtains a system which is related to Anderson's relevant deontic logic and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • An integrated framework for ought-to-be and ought-to-do constraints.P. D'Altan, J.-J. Ch Meyer & R. J. Wieringa - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (2):77-111.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Andersonian Deontic Logic, Propositional Quantification, and Mally.Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (3):385-395.
    We present a new axiomatization of the deontic fragment of Anderson's relevant deontic logic, give an Andersonian reduction of a relevant version of Mally's deontic logic previously discussed in this journal, study the effect of adding propositional quantification to Anderson's system, and discuss the meaning of Anderson's propositional constant in a wide range of Andersonian deontic systems.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations