Switch to: References

Citations of:

Systemic materialism

In Javier Pérez-Jara, Lino Camprubí & Gustavo E. Romero, Contemporary Materialism: Its Ontology and Epistemology. New York, NY, USA: Springer Synthese. pp. 79-107 (2022)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Architecture of Relational Materialism: A Categorial Formation of Onto-Epistemological Premises.Ozan Ekin Derin & Bekir Baytaş - forthcoming - Foundations of Science 30:1-51.
    This study formulates the basic premises of materialism, which has largely lost its visibility despite being one of the fundamental philosophical approaches that have been effective in the development of modern scientific practice and the construction of philosophy of science, in an alternative way, and aims to develop a new materialist interpretation of it that is non-reductive, pluralistic and open to the use of more than one scientific discipline. This interpretation, expressed with the term relational materialism, first addresses matter with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Philosophy of Ideology.Gustavo E. Romero - forthcoming - In Javier Pérez Jara & Íñigo Ongay de Felipe, Overcoming the Nature Versus Nurture Debate. Springer.
    The concept of ideology is central to the understanding of the many political, economic, social, and cultural processes that have occurred in the last two centuries. And yet, what is the nature of the different ideologies remains a vague, open, and much disputed question. Many political, sociological, and ideological studies have been devoted to ideology. Very little, on the other hand, has been done from the philosophical field. And this despite the fact that there are undoubtedly many philosophical questions related (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse - No. 3 - Metascientific Epistemology.François Maurice - 2024 - Mεtascience: Scientific General Discourse 3:1-312.
    [[THIS IS THE COMPLETE THIRD ISSUE OF MΕTASCIENCE]] -/- This third issue of the journal Mεtascience continues the characterization of this new branch of knowledge that is metascience. If it is new, it is not in a radical sense since Mario Bunge practiced it in an exemplary way, since logical positivists were accused of practicing only a mere metascience, since scientists have always practiced it implicitly, and since some philosophers no longer practice philosophy but rather metascience, but without characterizing it (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark