Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Enabling Demonstrated Consent for Biobanking with Blockchain and Generative AI.Caspar Barnes, Mateo Riobo Aboy, Timo Minssen, Jemima Winifred Allen, Brian D. Earp, Julian Savulescu & Sebastian Porsdam Mann - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-16.
    Participation in research is supposed to be voluntary and informed. Yet it is difficult to ensure people are adequately informed about the potential uses of their biological materials when they donate samples for future research. We propose a novel consent framework which we call “demonstrated consent” that leverages blockchain technology and generative AI to address this problem. In a demonstrated consent model, each donated sample is associated with a unique non-fungible token (NFT) on a blockchain, which records in its metadata (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The social licence for data-intensive health research: towards co-creation, public value and trust.Johannes J. M. van Delden, Menno Mostert, Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel, Shona Kalkman & Sam H. A. Muller - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-9.
    BackgroundThe rise of Big Data-driven health research challenges the assumed contribution of medical research to the public good, raising questions about whether the status of such research as a common good should be taken for granted, and how public trust can be preserved. Scandals arising out of sharing data during medical research have pointed out that going beyond the requirements of law may be necessary for sustaining trust in data-intensive health research. We propose building upon the use of a social (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation