Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Collingridge’s dilemma and technoscience.Wolfgang Liebert & Jan C. Schmidt - 2010 - Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):55-71.
    Collingridge’s dilemma is one of the most well-established paradigms presenting a challenge to Technology Assessment (TA). This paper aims to reconstruct the dilemma from an analytic perspective and explicates three assumptions underlying the dilemma: the temporal, knowledge and power/actor assumptions. In the light of the recent transformation of the science, technology and innovation system—in the age of technoscience —these underlying assumptions are called into question. The same result is obtained from a normative angle by Collingridge himself; he criticises the dilemma (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Research ethics committees and paternalism.S. J. L. Edwards - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):88-91.
    In this paper the authors argue that research ethics committees should not be paternalistic by rejecting research that poses risk to people competent to decide for themselves. However it is important they help to ensure valid consent is sought from potential recruits and protect vulnerable people who cannot look after their own best interests. The authors first describe the tragic deaths of Jesse Gelsinger and Ellen Roche. They then discuss the following claims to support their case: competent individuals are epistemologically (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Scientific research is a moral duty.J. Harris - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):242-248.
    Biomedical research is so important that there is a positive moral obligation to pursue it and to participate in itScience is under attack. In Europe, America, and Australasia in particular, scientists are objects of suspicion and are on the defensive.i“Frankenstein science”5–8 is a phrase never far from the lips of those who take exception to some aspect of science or indeed some supposed abuse by scientists. We should not, however, forget the powerful obligation there is to undertake, support, and participate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   118 citations  
  • What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics.E. Garrard - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):419-423.
    In a recent paper Edwards, Kirchin, and Huxtable have argued that research ethics committees (RECs) are often wrongfully paternalistic in their approach to medical research. They argue that it should be left to competent potential research subjects to make judgments about the acceptability of harms and benefits relating to research, and that this is not a legitimate role for any REC. They allow an exception to their overall antipaternalism, however, in that they think RECs should have the power to prohibit (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Biological and health data: ethical issues.Nuffield Council - 2016 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 20 (1):277-288.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik Jahrgang: 20 Heft: 1 Seiten: 277-288.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble.Pam Carter, Graeme T. Laurie & Mary Dixon-Woods - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (5):404-409.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • Can Patents Deter Innovation?Michael Heller & Rebecca Eisenberg - 1998 - Science 280:698-701.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   75 citations