Switch to: References

Citations of:

Grotius and Pufendorf on the Right of Necessity

John Salter

History of Political Thought 26 (2):285-302 (2005)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

Hugo Grotius and Samuel Pufendorf on the power of necessity to override property rights.Juliana Udi - 2014 - Agora 33 (2):1-18.details En el presente trabajo analizo el “derecho de necesidad” que Hugo Grocio y Samuel Pufendorf reconocen a las personas que atraviesan una situación de necesidad extrema. Explicito su estatus deóntico, su base justificatoria y sus exigencias con el objetivo de evaluar sus consecuencias distributivas. Me propongo mostrar que, a pesar de la considerable atención que ambos autores prestan a la cuestión de la fuerza de la necesidad de unos individuos para sobreponerse a los derechos de propiedad de otros, las consecuencias (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
Det vi eide førfast eiendom. Hugo Grotius og suum (What We Own Before Property: Hugo Grotius and the suum).Alejandra Mancilla - 2013 - Arr, Idéhistorisk Tiddskrift 3:3-14.details At the basis of modern natural law theories, the concept of the suum, or what belongs to the person (in Latin, his, her, its, their own), has received little scholarly attention despite its importance both in explaining and justifying not only the genealogy of property, but also that of morality and war.1 In this paper I examine Hugo Grotius's what it is, what things it includes, what rights it gives rise to and how it is extended in the transition from (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
Noncivil Disobedience and the Right of Necessity. A Point of Convergence.Alejandra Mancilla - 2012 - Krisis 3:3-15.details Given the conceptual gap in the global justice debate today (where most of the talk is about the duties of the rich, but little is said about what the poor may do for themselves), in this article I reintroduce the idea of a right of necessity. I first delineate a normative framework for such a right, inspired by these historical accounts. I then offer a contemporary case where the exercise of the right of necessity would be morally legitimate according to (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 3 citations
Natural Rights to Welfare.Siegfried Van Duffel - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):641-664.details : Many people have lamented the proliferation of human rights claims. The cure for this problem, it may be thought, would be to develop a theory that can distinguish ‘real’ from ‘supposed’ human rights. I argue, however, that the proliferation of human rights mirrors a deep problem in human rights theory itself. Contemporary theories of natural rights to welfare are historical descendants from a theory of rights to subsistence which was developed in twelfth-century Europe. According to this theory, each human (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
Grotius and Kant on Original Community of Goods and Property.Sylvie Loriaux - 2017 - Grotiana 38 (1):106-128.details _ Source: _Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 106 - 128 This paper is interested in the critical potential of the idea of original common possession of the Earth. On the basis of a comparative analysis of Hugo Grotius and Immanuel Kant, it shows how different the meaning of this idea can be within a theory of property or territory. The first part is devoted to Grotius’s account of why and how the institution of property was progressively introduced. It highlights the (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 3 citations
The moral person of the state : Emer de Vattel and the foundations of international legal order.Ben Holland - 2011 - History of European Ideas 37 (4):438-445.details Emer de Vattel was the first writer systematically to combine three arguments in a single work, namely: that states have a fundamental duty of self-interestedness; that they nonetheless have reason to see themselves as inhabiting a kind of society; and that this society is held together by positive agreements between its members on rules that shall regulate their interactions. This article explores how Vattel arrived at his vision of international order. It points to the significance of his understanding of the (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 2 citations
(1 other version)Common Possession of the Earth and Cosmopolitan Right.Alice Pinheiro Walla - 2018 - Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (13):255-276.details La posesión común de la tierra fue una idea prominente en la filosofía moderna del siglo xvii. En este artículo, sostendré que Kant no sólo propuso una versión secular de la posesión común de la tierra, sino que también se diferenció de forma radical de la concepción iusnaturalista de sus predecesores. Propongo que la revisión kantiana del derecho cosmopolita se dirige al mismo problema que el derecho de necesidad de Grocio, a saber, la implausibilidad de asumir derechos adquiridos absolutos cuando (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation

1