Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Self-diagnosis of psychiatric conditions as a threat to personal autonomy.Ilir Isufi - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
    I argue that the recurring practice of self-diagnosis of psychiatric conditions such as autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on social media platforms poses a threat to personal autonomy understood as self-governance. My main argument is that self-diagnosis conducted without professional expertise is prone to lead to misdiagnosis, which can take the form of a distortion of self-image. This may result in pathologizing normal experiences and behaviors and the adoption of behavioral adjustments that harm those who engage in self-diagnosis. Acknowledging (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The ethics of autism.Kristien Hens, Ingrid Robeyns & Katrien Schaubroeck - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 14 (1):e12559.
    The diagnosis of autism is on the rise. Autistic people, parents, professionals, and policy makers alike face important questions about the right approach toward autism. For example, there are questions about the desirability of early detection, the role and consequences of underlying cognitive theories, and whether autism is a disorder to be treated or an identity to be respected. How does the fact that autism is a heterogeneous concept affect the answers to these questions? Who has the authority or knowledge (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Establishing the accuracy of self-diagnosis in psychiatry.Sam Fellowes - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
    Self-diagnosis in psychiatry is where individuals diagnose themselves rather than rely upon official diagnosticians to supply a psychiatric diagnosis. The accuracy of self-diagnosis is a contested topic. In this paper, I outline what arguments are needed to see self-diagnosis as accurate and how different approaches to self-diagnosis require different arguments. I show how different arguments are required to justify accuracy for an autistic individual judging they are autistic compared to non-autistic individuals judging they are not autistic. Different arguments are required (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The new self-advocacy activism in psychiatry: Toward a scientific turn.Sarah Arnaud & Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
    The anti-psychiatry movement of the 20th century has notably denounced the role of values and social norms in the shaping of psychiatric categories. Recent activist movements also recognize that psychiatry is value-laden, however, they do not fight for a value-free psychiatry. On the contrary, some activist movements of the 21st century advocate for self-advocacy in sciences of mental health in order to reach a more accurate understanding of psychiatric categories/mental distress. By aiming at such epistemic gain, they depart from the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Neurodiversity and Autism Advocacy: Who Fits Under the Autism Tent?Kenneth A. Richman - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (4):33-34.
    McCoy, Liu, Lutz, and Sisti (2020) raise concerns about “partial representation,” in which nonelected advocates or advocacy organizations fail to engage and hold themselves accountable to the full range of people they purport to represent. They are right to point out that the autism community is vulnerable to partial representation. This open peer commentary notes some elements among those engaged with autism that may not fit under the type of “federated model” of representation McCoy, et al recommend. Advocates should tread (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • No Mere Difference.David Devidi & Catherine Klausen - 2017 - Dialogue 56 (2):357-379.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Beyond Autism: Advocacy for Neurodevelopmental Differences.William D. Graf - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (4):30-33.
    Volume 20, Issue 4, May 2020, Page 30-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark