Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Boundaryless Careers and Employability Obligations.Harry J. Van Buren Iii - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):131-149.
    Abstract:Boundaryless careers may be beneficial to people with rare and valuable skills, but might prove harmful to many others. The idea ofemployabilityas an ethical responsibility of employers to employees is introduced; it is argued that attention to employability in private practice and public policy partially resolves the ethical problems inherent to in boundaryless careers. Because employability programs are considered to be voluntary, some means of holding employers accountable for such responsibilities needs to be considered when discussing boundaryless careers. Implications for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Beyond antidoping and harm minimisation: a stakeholder-corporate social responsibility approach to drug control for sport.Jason Mazanov - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (4):220-223.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Engineering Codes of Ethics and the Duty to Set a Moral Precedent.Eugene Schlossberger - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1333-1344.
    Each of the major engineering societies has its own code of ethics. Seven “common core” clauses and several code-specific clauses can be identified. The paper articulates objections to and rationales for two clauses that raise controversy: do engineers have a duty to provide pro bono services and/or speak out on major issues, and to associate only with reputable individuals and organizations? This latter “association clause” can be justified by the “proclamative principle,” an alternative to Kant’s universalizability requirement. At the heart (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The stakeholder theory and the common good.Antonio Argandoña - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1093-1102.
    The theory of the social responsibility of the firm oscillates between two extremes: one that reduces the firm's responsibility to the obtainment of (the greatest possible) profit for its shareholders, and another that extends the firm's responsibility to include a wide range of actors with an interest or "stake" in the firm. The stakeholder theory of the social responsibility of business is more appealing from an ethical point of view, and yet it lacks a solid foundation that would be acceptable (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   85 citations  
  • Of Babies and Bathwater.Eugene Szwajkowski & Raymond E. Figlewicz - 1997 - Business and Society 36 (4):362-386.
    A research forum published in Business & Society in 1995 (Issue 2) analyzed whether Fortune magazine's annual Reputation Survey (FRS) is viable as a corporate social performance (CSP) research database. We examine plausible alternative interpretations for a number of assertions and conclusions by the forum authors, including the premise for Brown and Perry's proposed transformation: that the Fortune data are confounded by the presence of a financial "halo," which biases ratings of nonfinancial attributes. Finally, we examine the appropriate roles of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Justice and financial market allocation of the social costs of business.Sandra L. Christensen & Brian Grinder - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):105-112.
    Regulation is often applied to business behavior to ensure that the social costs of doing business are included in the cost and pricing structures of the firm. Because the consumer benefits from the transaction that generated the social costs, asking the consumer to bear the burden imposed by the transaction is fair. However, there may be a lack of Justice m the internal and external distribution of the social costs of doing business if consumers are the only party bearing that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Implementing the New UN Corporate Human Rights Framework: Implications for Corporate Law, Governance, and Regulation.Peter Muchlinski - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (1):145-177.
    ABSTRACT:The UN Framework on Human Rights and Business comprises the State’s duty to protect human rights, the corporate responsibility to respect human rights, and the duty to remedy abuses. This paper focuses on the corporate responsibility to respect. It considers how to overcome obstacles, arising out of national and international law, to the development of a legally binding corporate duty to respect human rights. It is argued that the notion of human rights due diligence will lead to the creation of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Do shareholders have obligations to stakeholders?Earl W. Spurgin - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):287 - 297.
    The question of whether, and to what extent, business managers have obligations to stakeholders has been the principal theme in much of recent business ethics literature. The question of whether shareholders have obligations to stakeholders, however, has not been addressed sufficiently. I provide some needed attention to this matter by examining the positions of shareholders in the contemporary world of investing. Their positions are considerably different than that often envisioned by business ethicists and economists where shareholders determine the directions of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Responsibility and practice in notions of corporate social responsibility.Denise Kleinrichert - unknown
    This treatise presents a transcendental argument for corporate social responsibility. The argument is that corporate social responsibility, or CSR, is best understood as a collective moral practice that is a precondition for sustainable business. There are a number of theories and definitions of CSR in the contemporary business literature. These theories include considerations of economic, legal, social, and environmental notions of what a corporation ought to take responsibility for based on either motives or concerns of accountability for corporate acts. This (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The middle path: Using dual-investor theory in teaching business ethics.Eugene Schlossberger - 1998 - Teaching Business Ethics 2 (2):127-136.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Losing the right to the truth.Eugene Schlossberger - 1999 - Journal of Value Inquiry 33 (3):389-403.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Wealth creation without domination. The fiduciary duties of corporations.Rutger Claassen - 2024 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 27 (3):317-338.
    Corporations wield power in today’s economies, and political theories of the corporation argue about the legitimacy conditions of corporate power. This paper argues in favour of a double-fiduciary theory for corporations. Based on a concession theory of markets, it sees all markets as authorized by states (in the name of society), for the purpose of creating economic value, or wealth. Hence corporations, as much as non-incorporated firms, have a fiduciary duty to the state/society to create wealth, in the competitive structure (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Employing Normative Stakeholder Theory in Developing Countries.Darryl Reed - 2002 - Business and Society 41 (2):166-207.
    Although the use of stakeholder analysis to investigate corporate responsibilities has burgeoned over the past two decades, there has been relatively little workon howcorporate responsibilities may change for firms with operations in developing countries. This article argues, from a critical theory perspective, that two sets of factors tend to come together to increase the responsibilities of corporations active in developing countries to a full range of stakeholder groups: (a) the different (economic, political, and sociocultural) circumstances under which corporations have to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations