Switch to: References

Citations of:

Departures: at the crossroads between Heidegger and Kant

Frank Schalow

Boston: De Gruyter (2013)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

Ambient Temporalities: Rethinking Object-Oriented Time through Kant, Husserl, and Heidegger.Jamie Stephenson - 2024 - Open Philosophy 7 (1):1-31.details Immanuel Kant is often conveyed as a Platonic or Newtonian thinker of the temporal, expressing time as an absolute and continuous repository wherein all objects occur. However, employing themes from his aesthetic writings, what happens when Kantian “sublime” time is reoriented towards a more discontinuous temporal register? This essay employs just such a reading, while also utilising Graham Harman’s Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO), as a methodological device for rethinking both Kantian and object time as neither solely continuous nor discontinuous, but somewhere (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
A Tale of Two Faculties: Heidegger's Method of Interpreting Kant.Morganna Lambeth - 2021 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 38 (1):57-80.details Against the consensus that Heidegger reads his own philosophical views into Kant, I argue that Heidegger takes up the main question posed by the first Critique and attempts to identify Kant's best answer to it. Heidegger's method resembles those of Gadamer and Davidson. But by reading the first Critique as offering two conflicting strands of argument, he abandons their aim of maximizing truth, and his theory of error explains why Kant offers the less-promising strand. Heidegger thus provides a distinctive model (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
A ground completely overgrown: Heidegger, Kant and the problem of metaphysics.Karin de Boer & Stephen Howard - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (2):358-377.details While we endorse Heidegger’s effort to reclaim Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason as a work concerned with the possibility of metaphysics, we hold, first, that his reading is less original than is often assumed and, second, that it unduly marginalizes the critical impetus of Kant’s philosophy. This article seeks to shed new light on Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics and related texts by relating Heidegger’s interpretation of Kant to, on the one hand, the epistemological approach represented by Cohen’s Kant’s (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 6 citations
Lessons from Heidegger’s Attempt to Rethink Science in his “Beiträge”.George Kovacs - 2022 - Heidegger Studies 38 (1):105-119.details Heidegger’s understanding of the relationship between philosophy and science is expressed in his claim that they are not hostile towards each other, i.e., that philosophy is neither for nor against science, though they differ in ambition, strength, and methodology. Their interaction, as this essay suggests, may contribute to the range and diversification of philosophical thinking and to a deeper grasp of the strength and boundary (potential and limitation) of scientific inquiry and knowing. Heidegger’s rethinking of science, especially in his twenty-four (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation
From Kant to Heidegger. On the path from self-consciousness to self-understanding.Claus Langbehn - 2016 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 47 (4):329-346.details ABSTRACTIn this article I explore the idea that Heidegger's lectures on The Basic Problems of Phenomenology are of particular importance to our understanding of the relationship between Heidegger and Kant. These lectures can be read as a “historical” commentary on Being and Time. Of course, Heidegger does not present himself as a historian of philosophy, but acts as a philosophical reader of Kant in order to expound the principal ideas of his own philosophy. My central claim is that it is (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation

1