Switch to: References

Citations of:

Skorupski on Being For

Analysis 72 (4):735-739 (2012)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why the Negation Problem Is Not a Problem for Expressivism.Jeremy Schwartz & Christopher Hom - 2014 - Noûs 48 (2):824-845.
    The Negation Problem states that expressivism has insufficient structure to account for the various ways in which a moral sentence can be negated. We argue that the Negation Problem does not arise for expressivist accounts of all normative language but arises only for the specific examples on which expressivists usually focus. In support of this claim, we argue for the following three theses: 1) a problem that is structurally identical to the Negation Problem arises in non-normative cases, and this problem (...)
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Reply to Schroeder on being for.J. Skorupski - 2013 - Analysis 73 (3):483-487.
    This article is a discussion of Mark Schroeder's response to my earlier criticism of some aspects of his book, Being For. I defend the soundness of that earlier criticism.
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Expression and Guidance in Schroeder’s Expressivist Semantics.Derek Baker - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (4):829-852.
    Mark Schroeder’s expressivist program has made substantial progress in providing a compositional semantics for normative terms. This paper argues that it risks achieving this semantic progress at the cost of abandoning a key theoretical motivation for embracing expressivism in the first place. The problem can be summarized as a dilemma. Either Schroeder must allow that there are cases in which agents are in disagreement with one another, or can make valid inferences, but that these disagreements or inferences are not expressible (...)
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations