Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Theoretical aids in teaching medical ethics.Michael H. Kottow - 1999 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (3):225-229.
    Medical ethics could be better understood if some basic theoretical aspects of practices in health care are analysed. By discussing the underlying ethical principles that govern medical practice, the student should also become familiar with the notion that medical ethics is much more than the external application of socially accepted moral standards. Professions in general and medicine in particular have internal values that command their moral virtuosity at the same time as their technical excellence. Three examples where clinical practice can (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • In defence of medical ethics.M. H. Kottow - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):340-343.
    A number of recent publications by the philosopher David Seedhouse are discussed. Although medicine is an eminently ethical enterprise, the technical and ethical aspects of health care practices can be distinguished, therefore justifying the existence of medical ethics and its teaching as a specific part of every medical curriculum. The goal of teaching medical ethics is to make health care practitioners aware of the essential ethical aspects of their work. Furthermore, the contention that rational bioethics is a fruitless enterprise because (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • What’s the difference between health care ethics, medical ethics and nursing ethics?David Seedhouse - 1997 - Health Care Analysis 5 (4):267-274.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The rationale of value‐laden medicine.Michael H. Kottow Ma Md - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (1):77-84.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • A reply to Professor Seedhouse.M. H. Kottow - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):349-350.
    This brief reply gives a few references and clarifies some points in order to emphasize that a number of Professor Seedhouse's assertions are debatable and that his criticism of slovenly scholarship and his unbridled ad hominem argumentation are out of place and easily refuted.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Camouflage is no defence--a response to Kottow.D. Seedhouse - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):344-350.
    The author responds to Professor Kottow's criticisms, explaining numerous errors and misconceptions.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Arguments at cross-purposes: moral epistemology and medical ethics.M. Loughlin - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (1):28-32.
    Different beliefs about the nature and justification of bioethics may reflect different assumptions in moral epistemology. Two alternative views (put forward by David Seedhouse and Michael H Kottow) are analysed and some speculative conclusions formed. The foundational questions raised here are by no means settled and deserve further attention.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Camouflage is still no defence – another plea for a straight answer to the question 'what is bioethics?'.Michael Loughlin - 2004 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (1):75-83.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Critical thinking vs. moral expertise: a commentary on 'The rationale of value‐laden medicine' (Kottow 2002; Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8, 77–84). [REVIEW]Michael Loughlin - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (1):92-94.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations