Switch to: References

Citations of:

Is There a Paradox of Moral Complaint?

Utilitas 23 (3):344-351 (2011)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Good and the Wrong of Hypocritical Blaming.Kartik Upadhyaya - 2024 - Utilitas 36 (1):83-101.
    Provided we blame others accurately, is blaming them morally right even if we are guilty of similar wrongdoing ourselves? On the one hand, hypocrisy seems to render blame morally wrong, and unjustified; but on the other, even hypocritical blaming seems better than silence. I develop an account of the wrongness of hypocritical blaming which resolves this apparent dilemma. When holding others accountable for their moral failings, we ought to be willing to reason, together with them, about our own, similar failings. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Overpunishment and the punishment of the innocent.Saul Smilansky - 2021 - Analytic Philosophy 63 (4):232-244.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Second-Personal Solution to the Paradox of Moral Complaint.Adam Piovarchy - 2021 - Utilitas 33 (1):111-117.
    Smilansky notes that wrongdoers seem to lack any entitlement to complain about being treated in the ways that they have treated others. However, it also seems impermissible to treat agents in certain ways, and this impermissibility would give wrongdoers who are themselves wronged grounds for complaint. This article solves this apparent paradox by arguing that what is at issue is not the right simply to make complaints, but the right to have one's demands respected. Agents must accept the authority of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Should We Sacrifice the Utilitarians First?Saul Smilansky - 2020 - Philosophical Quarterly 70 (281):850-867.
    It is commonly thought that morality applies universally to all human beings as moral targets, and our general moral obligations to people will not, as a rule, be affected by their views. I propose and explore a radical, alternative normative moral theory, ‘Designer Ethics’, according to which our views are pro tanto crucial determinants of how, morally, we ought to be treated. For example, since utilitarians are more sympathetic to the idea that human beings may be sacrificed for the greater (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The Paradox of Moral Complaint: A Reply to Shaham.Saul Smilansky - 2013 - Utilitas 25 (2):277-282.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations