Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Commentary on “an analytical hierarchy process model to apportion co-author responsibility”.Michael C. Loui - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):567-570.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • A Simple Framework for Evaluating Authorial Contributions for Scientific Publications.Jeffrey M. Warrender - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1419-1430.
    A simple tool is provided to assist researchers in assessing contributions to a scientific publication, for ease in evaluating which contributors qualify for authorship, and in what order the authors should be listed. The tool identifies four phases of activity leading to a publication—Conception and Design, Data Acquisition, Analysis and Interpretation, and Manuscript Preparation. By comparing a project participant’s contribution in a given phase to several specified thresholds, a score of up to five points can be assigned; the contributor’s scores (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • “Technical” Contributors and Authorship Distribution in Health Science.Elise Smith - 2023 - Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (4):1-19.
    In health sciences, technical contributions may be undervalued and excluded in the author byline. In this paper, I demonstrate how authorship is a historical construct which perpetuates systemic injustices including technical undervaluation. I make use of Pierre Bourdieu’s conceptual work to demonstrate how the power dynamics at play in academia make it very challenging to change the habitual state or “habitus”. To counter this, I argue that we must reconceive technical contributions to not be a priori less important based on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles.T. Prabhakar Clement - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):345-361.
    We propose a rational method for addressing an important question—who deserves to be an author of a scientific article? We review various contentious issues associated with this question and recommend that the scientific community should view authorship in terms of contributions and responsibilities, rather than credits. We propose a new paradigm that conceptually divides a scientific article into four basic elements: ideas, work, writing, and stewardship. We employ these four fundamental elements to modify the well-known International Committee of Medical Journal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Research ethics, research integrity and the responsible conduct of research.Stephanie J. Bird - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):411-412.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations