Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The authorship list in science: Junior physicists' perceptions of who appears and why. [REVIEW]Eugen Tarnow - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):73-88.
    A questionnaire probing the distribution of authorship credit was given to postdoctoral associates (“postdocs”) in order to determine their awareness of the professional society’s ethical statement on authorship, the extent of communication with their supervisors about authorship criteria, and the appropriateness of authorship assignments on submitted papers. Results indicate a low awareness of the professional society’s ethical statement and that little communication takes place between postdocs and supervisors about authorship criteria. A substantial amount of authorship credit given to supervisors and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science.David B. Resnik - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):237-243.
    This essay discusses some of the problems with current authorship practices and puts forward a proposal for a new system of credit allocation: in published works, scientists should more clearly define the responsibilities and contributions of members of research teams and should distinguish between different roles, such as author, statistican, technician, grant writer, data collector, and so forth.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Apportioning credit to multiple authors: A brief note.Theodore J. Sheskin - 2002 - Journal of Information Ethics 11 (2):5-6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation