We show how to build various models of first-order theories, which also have properties like: tree with only definable branches, atomic Boolean algebras or ordered fields with only definable automorphisms. For this we use a set-theoretic assertion, which may be interesting by itself on the existence of quite generic subsets of suitable partial orders of power λ + , which follows from ♦ λ and even weaker hypotheses . For a related assertion, which is equivalent to the morass see Shelah (...) and Stanley [16]. The various specific constructions serve also as examples of how to use this set-theoretic lemma. We apply the method to construct rigid ordered fields, rigid atomic Boolean algebras, trees with only definable branches; all in successors of regular cardinals under appropriate set- theoretic assumptions. So we are able to answer the following algebraic question. Saltzman's Question . Is there a rigid real closed field, which is not a subfield of the reals? (shrink)

Shelah, S., C. Laflamme and B. Hart, Models with second order properties V: A general principle, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 64 169–194. We present a general framework for carrying out the construction in [2-10] and others of the same type. The unifying factor is a combinatorial principle which we present in terms of a game in which the first player challenges the second player to carry out constructions which would be much easier in a generic extension of the (...) universe, and the second player cheats with the aid of ♦. Section 1 contains an axiomatic framework suitable for the description of a number of related constructions, and the statement of the main theorem 1.9 in terms of this framework. In Section 2 we illustrate the use of our combinatorial principle. The proof of the main result is then carried out in Sections 3–5. (shrink)

We show that a strong form of the so called Lindström’s Theorem [4] fails to generalize to extensions of L κ ω and L κ κ : For weakly compact κ there is no strongest extension of L κ ω with the (κ,κ)-compactness property and the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem down to κ. With an additional set-theoretic assumption, there is no strongest extension of L κ κ with the (κ,κ)-compactness property and the Löwenheim-Skolem theorem down to <κ.

THEOREM 1. (⋄ ℵ 1 ) If B is an infinite Boolean algebra (BA), then there is B 1 such that $|\operatorname{Aut} (B_1)| \leq B_1| = \aleph_1$ and $\langle B_1, \operatorname{Aut} (B_1)\rangle \equiv \langle B, \operatorname{Aut}(B)\rangle$ . THEOREM 2. (⋄ ℵ 1 ) There is a countably compact logic stronger than first-order logic even on finite models. This partially answers a question of H. Friedman. These theorems appear in §§ 1 and 2. THEOREM 3. (a) (⋄ ℵ 1 ) If (...) B is an atomic ℵ 1 -saturated infinite BA, ψ ε L ω 1ω and $\langle B, \operatorname{Aut} (B)\rangle \models\psi$ then there is B 1 such that $|\operatorname{Aut}(B_1)| \leq |B_1| = \aleph_1$ and $\langle B_1, \operatorname{Aut}(B_1)\rangle\models\psi$ . In particular if B is 1-homogeneous so is B 1 . (b) (a) holds for B = P(ω) even if we assume only CH. (shrink)

Let L(Q) be first order logic with Keisler's quantifier, in the λ + interpretation (= the satisfaction is defined as follows: $M \models (\mathbf{Q}x)\varphi(x)$ means there are λ + many elements in M satisfying the formula φ(x)). Theorem 1. Let λ be a singular cardinal; assume □ λ and GCH. If T is a complete theory in L(Q) of cardinality at most λ, and p is an L(Q) 1-type so that T strongly omits $p (= p$ has no support, to (...) be defined in $\S1$ ), then T has a model of cardinality λ + in the λ + interpretation which omits p. Theorem 2. Let λ be a singular cardinal, and let T be a complete first order theory of cardinality λ at most. Assume □ λ and GCH. If Γ is a smallness notion then T has a model of cardinality λ + such that a formula φ(x) is realized by λ + elements of M iff φ(x) is not Γ-small. The theorem is proved also when λ is regular assuming $\lambda = \lambda^{ . It is new when λ is singular or when |T| = λ is regular. Theorem 3. Let λ be singular. If $\operatorname{Con}(ZFC + GCH + (\exists\kappa)$ [κ is a strongly compact cardinal]), then the following in consistent: ZFC + GCH + the conclusions of all above theorems are false. (shrink)

The principal result of this paper answers a long-standing question in the model theory of arithmetic [R. Kossak, J. Schmerl, The Structure of Models of Peano Arithmetic, Oxford University Press, 2006, Question 7] by showing that there exists an uncountable arithmetically closed family of subsets of the set ω of natural numbers such that the expansion of the standard model of Peano arithmetic has no conservative elementary extension, i.e., for any elementary extension of , there is a subset of ω* (...) that is parametrically definable in but whose intersection with ω is not a member of . We also establish other results that highlight the role of countability in the model theory of arithmetic. Inspired by a recent question of Gitman and Hamkins, we furthermore show that the aforementioned family can be arranged to further satisfy the curious property that forcing with the quotient Boolean algebra collapses 1 when viewed as a notion of forcing. (shrink)