Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. $\Pi ^{0}_{1}$ -Encodability and Omniscient Reductions.Benoit Monin & Ludovic Patey - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (1):1-12.
    A set of integers A is computably encodable if every infinite set of integers has an infinite subset computing A. By a result of Solovay, the computably encodable sets are exactly the hyperarithmetic ones. In this article, we extend this notion of computable encodability to subsets of the Baire space, and we characterize the Π10-encodable compact sets as those which admit a nonempty Σ11-subset. Thanks to this equivalence, we prove that weak weak König’s lemma is not strongly computably reducible to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Internal cohen extensions.D. A. Martin & R. M. Solovay - 1970 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 2 (2):143-178.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   86 citations  
  • Codings of separable compact subsets of the first Baire class.Pandelis Dodos - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 142 (1):425-441.
    Let X be a Polish space and a separable compact subset of the first Baire class on X. For every sequence dense in , the descriptive set-theoretic properties of the set are analyzed. It is shown that if is not first countable, then is -complete. This can also happen even if is a pre-metric compactum of degree at most two, in the sense of S. Todorčević. However, if is of degree exactly two, then is always Borel. A deep result of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Sacks forcing, Laver forcing, and Martin's axiom.Haim Judah, Arnold W. Miller & Saharon Shelah - 1992 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 31 (3):145-161.
    In this paper we study the question assuming MA+⌝CH does Sacks forcing or Laver forcing collapse cardinals? We show that this question is equivalent to the question of what is the additivity of Marczewski's ideals 0. We give a proof that it is consistent that Sacks forcing collapses cardinals. On the other hand we show that Laver forcing does not collapse cardinals.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Infinite-dimensional Ellentuck spaces and Ramsey-classification theorems.Natasha Dobrinen - 2016 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 16 (1):1650003.
    We extend the hierarchy of finite-dimensional Ellentuck spaces to infinite dimensions. Using uniform barriers [Formula: see text] on [Formula: see text] as the prototype structures, we construct a class of continuum many topological Ramsey spaces [Formula: see text] which are Ellentuck-like in nature, and form a linearly ordered hierarchy under projections. We prove new Ramsey-classification theorems for equivalence relations on fronts, and hence also on barriers, on the spaces [Formula: see text], extending the Pudlák–Rödl theorem for barriers on the Ellentuck (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Combinatorial properties of classical forcing notions.Jörg Brendle - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 73 (2):143-170.
    We investigate the effect of adding a single real on cardinal invariants associated with the continuum. We show:1. adding an eventually different or a localization real adjoins a Luzin set of size continuum and a mad family of size ω1;2. Laver and Mathias forcing collapse the dominating number to ω1, and thus two Laver or Mathias reals added iteratively always force CH;3. Miller's rational perfect set forcing preserves the axiom MA.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • An effective proof that open sets are Ramsey.Jeremy Avigad - 1998 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 37 (4):235-240.
    Solovay has shown that if $\cal{O}$ is an open subset of $P(\omega)$ with code $S$ and no infinite set avoids $\cal{O}$ , then there is an infinite set hyperarithmetic in $S$ that lands in $\cal{O}$ . We provide a direct proof of this theorem that is easily formalizable in $ATR_0$.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The Galvin-Prikry theorem and set existen axioms.Kazuyuki Tanaka - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (1):81-104.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Matrices of completely Ramsey sets with infinitely many rows.Athanasios Tsarpalias - 2014 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 60 (1-2):54-58.
    The main result of the present article is the following: Let N be an infinite subset of,, and let be a matrix with infinitely many rows of completely Ramsey subsets of such that for every n,. Then there exist, a sequence of nonempty finite subsets of N, and an infinite subset T of such that for every infinite subset I of. We also give an application of this result to partitions of an uncountable analytic subset of a Polish space X (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A collection of topological Ramsey spaces of trees and their application to profinite graph theory.Yuan Yuan Zheng - 2018 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 57 (7-8):939-952.
    We construct a collection of new topological Ramsey spaces of trees. It is based on the Halpern-Läuchli theorem, but different from the Milliken space of strong subtrees. We give an example of its application by proving a partition theorem for profinite graphs.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Infinite combinatorics and definability.Arnold W. Miller - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 41 (2):179-203.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • Happy families.A. R. D. Mathias - 1977 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 12 (1):59.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   95 citations  
  • Happy families and completely Ramsey sets.Pierre Matet - 1993 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (3):151-171.
    We use games of Kastanas to obtain a new characterization of the classC ℱ of all sets that are completely Ramsey with respect to a given happy family ℱ. We then combine this with ideas of Plewik to give a uniform proof of various results of Ellentuck, Louveau, Mathias and Milliken concerning the extent ofC ℱ. We also study some cardinals that can be associated with the ideal ℐℱ of nowhere ℱ-Ramsey sets.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Combinatorics and forcing with distributive ideals.Pierre Matet - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 86 (2):137-201.
    We present a version for κ-distributive ideals over a regular infinite cardinal κ of some of the combinatorial results of Mathias on happy families. We also study an associated notion of forcing, which is a generalization of Mathias forcing and of Prikry forcing.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Mathias and set theory.Akihiro Kanamori - 2016 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 62 (3):278-294.
    On the occasion of his 70th birthday, the work of Adrian Mathias in set theory is surveyed in its full range and extent.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Δ12-sets of reals.Jaime I. Ihoda & Saharon Shelah - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (3):207-223.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • Δ< sup> 1< sub> 2-sets of reals.Jaime I. Ihoda & Saharon Shelah - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (3):207-223.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • DELTA ¹2-sets of reals.J. I. Ihoda - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (3):207.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • $${\Pi^1_2}$$ -comprehension and the property of Ramsey.Christoph Heinatsch - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (3-4):323-386.
    We show that a theory of autonomous iterated Ramseyness based on second order arithmetic (SOA) is proof-theoretically equivalent to ${\Pi^1_2}$ -comprehension. The property of Ramsey is defined as follows. Let X be a set of real numbers, i.e. a set of infinite sets of natural numbers. We call a set H of natural numbers homogeneous for X if either all infinite subsets of H are in X or all infinite subsets of H are not in X. X has the property (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Symmetries between two Ramsey properties.Lorenz Halbeisen - 1998 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 37 (4):241-260.
    In this article we compare the well-known Ramsey property with a dual form of it, the so called dual-Ramsey property (which was suggested first by Carlson and Simpson). Even if the two properties are different, it can be shown that all classical results known for the Ramsey property also hold for the dual-Ramsey property. We will also show that the dual-Ramsey property is closed under a generalized Suslin operation (the similar result for the Ramsey property was proved by Matet). Further (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A dichotomy result for a pointwise summable sequence of operators.V. Gregoriades - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (2):154-162.
    Let X be a separable Banach space and Q be a coanalytic subset of . We prove that the set of sequences in X which are weakly convergent to some eX and is a coanalytic subset of . The proof applies methods of effective descriptive set theory to Banach space theory. Using Silver’s Theorem [J. Silver, Every analytic set is Ramsey, J. Symbolic Logic 35 60–64], this result leads to the following dichotomy theorem: if X is a Banach space, is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Narrow coverings of ω-ary product spaces.Randall Dougherty - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (1):47-91.
    Results of Sierpiski and others have shown that certain finite-dimensional product sets can be written as unions of subsets, each of which is ‘narrow’ in a corresponding direction; that is, each line in that direction intersects the subset in a small set. For example, if the set ω × ω is partitioned into two pieces along the diagonal, then one piece meets every horizontal line in a finite set, and the other piece meets each vertical line in a finite set. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ramsey degrees of ultrafilters, pseudointersection numbers, and the tools of topological Ramsey spaces.Natasha Dobrinen & Sonia Navarro Flores - 2022 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 61 (7):1053-1090.
    This paper investigates properties of \(\sigma \) -closed forcings which generate ultrafilters satisfying weak partition relations. The Ramsey degree of an ultrafilter \({\mathcal {U}}\) for _n_-tuples, denoted \(t({\mathcal {U}},n)\), is the smallest number _t_ such that given any \(l\ge 2\) and coloring \(c:[\omega ]^n\rightarrow l\), there is a member \(X\in {\mathcal {U}}\) such that the restriction of _c_ to \([X]^n\) has no more than _t_ colors. Many well-known \(\sigma \) -closed forcings are known to generate ultrafilters with finite Ramsey degrees, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Selective ultrafilters and homogeneity.Andreas Blass - 1988 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 38 (3):215-255.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations