Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Intuitions About the Reference of Proper Names: a Meta-Analysis.Noah van Dongen, Matteo Colombo, Felipe Romero & Jan Sprenger - forthcoming - Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-30.
    The finding that intuitions about the reference of proper names vary cross-culturally was one of the early milestones in experimental philosophy. Many follow-up studies investigated the scope and magnitude of such cross-cultural effects, but our paper provides the first systematic meta-analysis of studies replicating. In the light of our results, we assess the existence and significance of cross-cultural effects for intuitions about the reference of proper names.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why Not All Evidence is Scientific Evidence.Carlos Santana - 2018 - Episteme 15 (2):209-227.
    Data which constitute satisfactory evidence in other contexts are sometimes not treated as valid evidence in the context of scientic conrmation. I give a justicatory explanation of this fact, appealing to the incentives, biases, and social situatedness of scientists.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Influence of Fear on Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis.Sean Wake, Jolie Wormwood & Ajay B. Satpute - 2020 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (6):1143-1159.
    A common finding in the study of emotion and decision making is the tendency for fear and anxiety to decrease risk taking. The current meta-analysis summarises the strength and variability of this...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Unfolding the Black Box of Questionable Research Practices: Where Is the Line Between Acceptable and Unacceptable Practices?Christian Linder & Siavash Farahbakhsh - 2020 - Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (3):335-360.
    ABSTRACTDespite the extensive literature on what questionable research practices are and how to measure them, the normative underpinnings of such practices have remained less explored. QRPs often fall into a grey area of justifiable and unjustifiable practices. Where to precisely draw the line between such practices challenges individual scholars and this harms science. We investigate QRPs from a normative perspective using the theory of communicative action. We highlight the role of the collective in assessing individual behaviours. Our contribution is a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Debunking the Myth of Value-Neutral Virginity: Toward Truth in Scientific Advertising.David R. Mandel & Philip E. Tetlock - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reflective Blindness, Depression and Unpleasant Experiences.Elizabeth Ventham - 2019 - Analysis 79 (4):684-693.
    This paper defends a desire-based understanding of pleasurable and unpleasant experiences. More specifically, the thesis is that what makes an experience pleasant/unpleasant is the subject having a certain kind of desire about that experience. I begin by introducing the ‘Desire Account’ in more detail, and then go on to explain and refute a prominent set of contemporary counter-examples, based on subjects who might have ‘Reflective Blindness’, looking particularly at the example of subjects with depression. I aim to make the Desire (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment.Denes Szucs & John P. A. Ioannidis - 2017 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Philosophy of Science and the Replicability Crisis.Felipe Romero - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (11).
    Replicability is widely taken to ground the epistemic authority of science. However, in recent years, important published findings in the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences have failed to replicate, suggesting that these fields are facing a “replicability crisis.” For philosophers, the crisis should not be taken as bad news but as an opportunity to do work on several fronts, including conceptual analysis, history and philosophy of science, research ethics, and social epistemology. This article introduces philosophers to these discussions. First, I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Seven Pervasive Statistical Flaws in Cognitive Training Interventions.David Moreau, Ian J. Kirk & Karen E. Waldie - 2016 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Toward a Radically Embodied Neuroscience of Attachment and Relationships.Lane Beckes, Hans IJzerman & Mattie Tops - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Building a Science of Individual Differences From fMRI.Julien Dubois & Ralph Adolphs - 2016 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (6):425-443.
    To date, fMRI research has been concerned primarily with evincing generic principles of brain function through averaging data from multiple subjects. Given rapid developments in both hardware and analysis tools, the field is now poised to study fMRI-derived measures in individual subjects, and to relate these to psy- chological traits or genetic variations. We discuss issues of validity, reliability and statistical assessment that arise when the focus shifts to individual subjects and that are applicable also to other imaging modalities. We (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Using Bayes to Get the Most Out of Non-Significant Results.Zoltan Dienes - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  • Who Should Do Replication Labor?Felipe Romero - 2018 - Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (4):516-537.
    . Scientists, for the most part, want to get it right. However, the social structures that govern their work undermine that aim, and this leads to nonreplicable findings in many fields. Because the social structure of science is a decentralized system, it is difficult to intervene. In this article, I discuss how we might do so, focusing on self-corrective-labor schemes. First, I argue that we need to implement a scheme that makes replication work outcome independent, systematic, and sustainable. Second, I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • P-Curving X-Phi: Does Experimental Philosophy Have Evidential Value?Michael T. Stuart, David Colaço & Edouard Machery - 2019 - Analysis 79 (4):669-684.
    In this article, we analyse the evidential value of the corpus of experimental philosophy. While experimental philosophers claim that their studies provide insight into philosophical problems, some philosophers and psychologists have expressed concerns that the findings from these studies lack evidential value. Barriers to evidential value include selection bias and p-hacking. To find out whether the significant findings in x-phi papers result from selection bias or p-hacking, we applied a p-curve analysis to a corpus of 365 x-phi chapters and articles. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy.Florian Cova, Brent Strickland, Angela Abatista, Aurélien Allard, James Andow, Mario Attie, James Beebe, Renatas Berniūnas, Jordane Boudesseul, Matteo Colombo, Fiery Cushman, Rodrigo Diaz, Noah N’Djaye Nikolai van Dongen, Vilius Dranseika, Brian D. Earp, Antonio Gaitán Torres, Ivar Hannikainen, José V. Hernández-Conde, Wenjia Hu, François Jaquet, Kareem Khalifa, Hanna Kim, Markus Kneer, Joshua Knobe, Miklos Kurthy, Anthony Lantian, Shen-yi Liao, Edouard Machery, Tania Moerenhout, Christian Mott, Mark Phelan, Jonathan Phillips, Navin Rambharose, Kevin Reuter, Felipe Romero, Paulo Sousa, Jan Sprenger, Emile Thalabard, Kevin Tobia, Hugo Viciana, Daniel Wilkenfeld & Xiang Zhou - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-36.
    Responding to recent concerns about the reliability of the published literature in psychology and other disciplines, we formed the X-Phi Replicability Project to estimate the reproducibility of experimental philosophy. Drawing on a representative sample of 40 x-phi studies published between 2003 and 2015, we enlisted 20 research teams across 8 countries to conduct a high-quality replication of each study in order to compare the results to the original published findings. We found that x-phi studies – as represented in our sample (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Effect Declines Are Systematic, Strong, and Ubiquitous: A Meta-Meta-Analysis of the Decline Effect in Intelligence Research.Jakob Pietschnig, Magdalena Siegel, Junia Sophia Nur Eder & Georg Gittler - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Bitter Truth About Sugar and Willpower.Miguel Vadillo - 2017 - Psychological Science:1-8.
    Dual-process theories of higher order cognition (DPTs) have been enjoying much success, particularly since Kahneman’s 2002 Nobel prize address and recent book Thinking, Fast and Slow (2009). Historically, DPTs have attempted to provide a conceptual framework that helps classify and predict differences in patterns of behavior found under some circumstances and not others in a host of reasoning, judgment, and decision-making tasks. As evidence has changed and techniques for examining behavior have moved on, so too have DPTs. Killing two birds (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Selection Bias, Vote Counting, and Money-Priming Effects: A Comment on Rohrer, Pashler, and Harris and Vohs.Miguel A. Vadillo, Tom E. Hardwicke & David R. Shanks - 2016 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145 (5):655-663.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Excess Success for Three Related Papers on Racial Bias.Gregory Francis - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Is the ANS Linked to Mathematics Performance?Matthew Inglis, Sophie Batchelor, Camilla Gilmore & Derrick G. Watson - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Publication Bias and the Limited Strength Model of Self-Control: Has the Evidence for Ego Depletion Been Overestimated?Evan C. Carter & Michael E. McCullough - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Commentary: Acetaminophen Enhances the Reflective Learning Process.Jonathon McPhetres - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Replicability and Reproducibility in Comparative Psychology.Jeffrey R. Stevens - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Animal-Assisted Intervention for Trauma: A Systematic Literature Review.Marguerite E. O'Haire, Noémie A. Guérin & Alison C. Kirkham - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Publication and Other Reporting Biases in Cognitive Sciences: Detection, Prevalence, and Prevention.John P. A. Ioannidis, Marcus R. Munafò, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Brian A. Nosek & Sean P. David - 2014 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18 (5):235-241.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Comment: Wood Et Al.'s Speculations of Inappropriate Research Practices in Ovulatory Cycle Studies.S. W. Gangestad - 2016 - Emotion Review 8 (1):87-90.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Emergence of Statistical Objectivity: Changing Ideas of Epistemic Vice and Virtue in Science.Jeremy Freese & David Peterson - 2018 - Sociological Theory 36 (3):289-313.
    The meaning of objectivity in any specific setting reflects historically situated understandings of both science and self. Recently, various scientific fields have confronted growing mistrust about the replicability of findings, and statistical techniques have been deployed to articulate a “crisis of false positives.” In response, epistemic activists have invoked a decidedly economic understanding of scientists’ selves. This has prompted a scientific social movement of proposed reforms, including regulating disclosure of “backstage” research details and enhancing incentives for replication. We theorize that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Americans Still Overestimate Social Class Mobility: A Pre-Registered Self-Replication.Michael W. Kraus - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Meta-Analyses Are No Substitute for Registered Replications: A Skeptical Perspective on Religious Priming.Michiel van Elk, Dora Matzke, Quentin F. Gronau, Maime Guan, Joachim Vandekerckhove & Eric-Jan Wagenmakers - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • A Bayesian Decision-Making Framework for Replication.Tom E. Hardwicke, Michael Henry Tessler, Benjamin N. Peloquin & Michael C. Frank - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How to Enhance the Power to Detect Brain–Behavior Correlations With Limited Resources.Benjamin de Haas - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Can Infants Learn Phonology in the Lab? A Meta-Analytic Answer.Alejandrina Cristia - 2018 - Cognition 170:312-327.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark