Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The love racket: Defining love and agapefor the love-and-science research program.Thomas Jay Oord - 2005 - Zygon 40 (4):919-938.
    Scholars of religion and science have generated remarkable scholarship in recent years in their explorations of love. Exactly how scholars involved in this budding field believe that love and science should relate and/or be integrated varies greatly. What they share in common is the belief that issues of love are of paramount importance and that the various scientific disciplines—whether natural, social, or religious—must be brought to bear upon how best to understand love. I briefly introduce the emergence of the love‐and‐science (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Evolutionary epistemology: What phenotype is selected and which genotype evolves?Raphael Falk - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (2):153-172.
    In 1941/42 Konrad Lorenz suggested that Kant's transcendental categories ofa priori knowledge could be given an empirical interpretation in Darwinian material evolutionary terms: a priori propositional knowledge was an organ subject to natural selection for adaptation to its specific environments. D. Campbell extended the conception, and termed evolution a process of knowledge. The philosophical problem of what knowledge is became a descriptive one of how knowledge developed, the normative semantic questions have been sidestepped, as if the descriptive insights would automatically (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations