Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Understanding, interests and informed consent: a reply to Sreenivasan.Danielle Bromwich - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):327-331.
    It is widely agreed that the view of informed consent found in the regulations and guidelines struggles to keep pace with the ever-advancing enterprise of human subjects research. Over the last 10 years, there have been serious attempts to rethink informed consent so that it conforms to our considered judgments about cases where we are confident valid consent has been given. These arguments are influenced by an argument from Gopal Sreenivasan, which apparently shows that a potential participant9s consent to research (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Therapeutic Misperceptions in Early‐Phase Cancer Trials: From Categorical to Continuous.Bryan A. Sisk & Eric Kodish - 2018 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 40 (4):13-20.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Taking Respect Seriously: Clinical Research and the Demands of Informed Consent.Lynn A. Jansen - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (3):342-360.
    There is broad agreement among research ethicists that investigators have a duty to obtain the informed consent of all subjects who participate in their research trials. On a common view, the duty to obtain this informed consent follows from the need to respect persons and their autonomous decisions. However, the nature of informed consent and the demands it places on investigators are open to dispute and recently have been challenged. Respect for persons, it has been claimed, does not require investigators (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation