Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Science review in research ethics committees: Double jeopardy?Stephen Humphreys, Hilary Thomas & Robyn Martin - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (4):227-237.
    Research ethics committees ‘(RECs) members’ perceptions of their role in regard to the science of research proposals are discussed. Our study, which involved the interviewing of 20 participants from amongst the UK’s independent (Phase I) ethics committees, revealed that the members consider that it is the role of the REC to examine and approve the scientific adequacy of the research – and this notwithstanding the fact that a more competent body will already have done this and even when that other (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Research ethics committee members’ perspectives on paediatric research: a qualitative interview study.Kajsa Norberg Wieslander, Anna T. Höglund, Sara Frygner-Holm & Tove Godskesen - 2023 - Research Ethics 19 (4):494-518.
    Research ethics committees (RECs) have a crucial role in protecting children in research. However, studies on REC members’ perspectives on paediatric research are scarce. We conducted a qualitative study to explore Swedish scientific REC members’ perspectives on ethical aspects in applications involving children with severe health conditions. The REC members considered promoting participation, protecting children and regulatory adherence to be central aspects. The results underscored the importance of not neglecting ill children’s rights to adapted information and participation. REC members supported (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation