Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. User involvement leads to more ethically sound research.Kristina Staley & Virginia Minogue - 2006 - Clinical Ethics 1 (2):95-100.
    Involving service users and carers in clinical research can help to improve its quality and relevance. By defining the limits of ethical acceptability, improving research design and management, ensuring information for participants is accessible and ensuring the views of participants are properly respected, user involvement can also improve the ethical conduct of research. But research proposals with good quality user involvement have experienced difficulties in obtaining ethical approval. Not all Research Ethics Committees (RECs) fully understand the active role of service (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Should research ethics committees meet in public?M. Sheehan - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):631-635.
    Currently, research ethics committees in the UK meet behind closed doors—their workings and most of the content of their decisions are unavailable to the general public. There is a significant tension between this current practice and a broader societal presumption of openness. As a form of public institution, the REC system exists to oversee research from the perspective of society generally.An important part of this tension turns on the kind of justification that might be offered for the REC system. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations