Switch to: References

Citations of:

When, and why, did Frege read Bolzano?

In Timothy Childers (ed.), the logica yearbook 1999. Prague: pp. 164-174 (2000)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bolzano and the Analytical Tradition.Sandra Lapointe - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (2):96-111.
    In the course of the last few decades, Bolzano has emerged as an important player in accounts of the history of philosophy. This should be no surprise. Few authors stand at a more central junction in the development of modern thought. Bolzano's contributions to logic and the theory of knowledge alone straddle three of the most important philosophical traditions of the 19th and 20th centuries: the Kantian school, the early phenomenological movement and what has come to be known as analytical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Century of Inference: 1837-1936.B. G. Sundholm - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Functions in Frege, Bolzano and Husserl.Stefania Centrone - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (4):315-336.
    This explorative article is organized around a set of questions concerning the concept of a function. First, a summary of certain general facts about functions that are a common coin in contemporary logic is given. Then Frege's attempt at clarifying the nature of functions in his famous paper Function and Concept and in his Grundgesetze is discussed along with some questions which Freges' approach gave rise to in the literature. Finally, some characteristic uses of functional notions to be found in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Bolzano and Kant on the Nature of Logic.Clinton Tolley - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):307-327.
    Here I revisit Bolzano's criticisms of Kant on the nature of logic. I argue that while Bolzano is correct in taking Kant to conceive of the traditional logic as a science of the activity of thinking rather than the content of thought, he is wrong to charge Kant with a failure to identify and examine this content itself within logic as such. This neglects Kant's own insistence that traditional logic does not exhaust logic as such, since it must be supplemented (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations