Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Successful implementation of cognitive reappraisal: effects of habit and situational factors.Or Cohen Ben Simon, Lior Ron & Shimrit Daches - 2022 - Cognition and Emotion 36 (8):1605-1612.
    Reappraisal is an adaptive emotion regulation strategy associated with favourable mental health outcomes. It is unclear whether the adaptive outcomes of habitual reappraisal are associated with better implementation of reappraisal when faced with negative affective situations. The current study aimed to examine whether habitual reappraisal predicts the implementation of instructed reappraisal and to evaluate the potential moderating effects of situational factors, namely – emotional intensity and reappraisal affordance. To address this question, 100 participants reported their habitual reappraisal tendency and were (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Associations of nature contact with emotional ill-being and well-being: the role of emotion regulation.Gregory N. Bratman, Ashish Mehta, Hector Olvera-Alvarez, Katie Malloy Spink, Chaja Levy, Mathew P. White, Laura D. Kubzansky & James J. Gross - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
    Nature contact has associations with emotional ill-being and well-being. However, the mechanisms underlying these associations are not fully understood. We hypothesised that increased adaptive and decreased maladaptive emotion regulation strategies would be a pathway linking nature contact to ill-being and well-being. Using data from a survey of 600 U.S.-based adults administered online in 2022, we conducted structural equation modelling to test our hypotheses. We found that (1) frequency of nature contact was significantly associated with lesser emotional ill-being and greater emotional (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Emotion regulation choice: a broad examination of external factors.Gerald Young & Gaurav Suri - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (2):242-261.
    Emotion regulation choices are known to be profoundly consequential across affective, cognitive, and social domains. Prior studies have identified two important external factors of emotion regulati...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Reappraising Reappraisal.Andero Uusberg, Jamie L. Taxer, Jennifer Yih, Helen Uusberg & James J. Gross - 2019 - Emotion Review 11 (4):267-282.
    What psychological mechanisms enable people to reappraise a situation to change its emotional impact? We propose that reappraisal works by shifting appraisal outcomes—abstract representations of ho...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Reappraising reappraisal: an expanded view.Andero Uusberg, Brett Ford, Helen Uusberg & James J. Gross - 2023 - Cognition and Emotion 37 (3):357-370.
    Reappraisal is a frequently used and often successful emotion regulation strategy. However, its underlying cognitive mechanisms are not well understood. In this paper, we seek to clarify these mechanisms by expanding upon our recently proposed reAppraisal framework. According to this framework, reappraisal consists of appraisal shifts that arise from changes to the mental construal of a situation (reconstrual) or from changes to the goals that are used to evaluate the construal (repurposing). Here we propose that reappraisal can target both object-level (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Motivated Cue-Integration and Emotion Regulation: Awareness of the Association Between Interoceptive and Exteroceptive Embodied Cues and Personal Need Creates an Emotion Goal.Idit Shalev - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Think again: the role of reappraisal in reducing negative valence bias.Maital Neta, Nicholas R. Harp, Tien T. Tong, Claudia J. Clinchard, Catherine C. Brown, James J. Gross & Andero Uusberg - 2023 - Cognition and Emotion 37 (2):238-253.
    Stimuli such as surprised faces are ambiguous in that they are associated with both positive and negative outcomes. Interestingly, people differ reliably in whether they evaluate these and other ambiguous stimuli as positive or negative, and we have argued that a positive evaluation relies in part on a biasing of the appraisal processes via reappraisal. To further test this idea, we conducted two studies to evaluate whether increasing the cognitive accessibility of reappraisal through a brief emotion regulation task would lead (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Monitoring processes in extended emotion regulation.Jonathan W. Murphy & Michael A. Young - 2020 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (5):1059-1067.
    The extended process model of emotion regulation posits that dynamic ER processes monitor and adjust the implementation of ER strategies over time. When an initial ER strategy is ineffective,...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The regulation of recurrent negative emotion in the aftermath of a lost election.Ashish Mehta, Magdalena Formanowicz, Andero Uusberg, Helen Uusberg, James J. Gross & Gaurav Suri - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (4):848-857.
    For some American voters, the news of Mr. Trump's victory in the 2016 presidential election caused recurrent emotions that were negative, persistent, and intense enough to elicit repeated attempts...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Looking on the bright side: the impact of ambivalent images on emotion regulation choice.Scarlett Horner, Lauryn Burleigh, Zachary Traylor & Steven G. Greening - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
    Previous research has found that people choose to reappraise low intensity images more often than high intensity images. However, this research does not account for image ambivalence, which is presence of both positive and negative cues in a stimulus. The purpose of this research was to determine differences in ambivalence in high intensity and low intensity images used in previous research (experiments 1–2), and if ambivalence played a role in emotion regulation choice in addition to intensity (experiments 3–4). Experiments 1 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark