Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Can AI determine its own future?Aybike Tunç - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-12.
    This article investigates the capacity of artificial intelligence (AI) systems to claim the right to self-determination while exploring the prerequisites for individuals or entities to exercise control over their own destinies. The paper delves into the concept of autonomy as a fundamental aspect of self-determination, drawing a distinction between moral and legal autonomy and emphasizing the pivotal role of dignity in establishing legal autonomy. The analysis examines various theories of dignity, with a particular focus on Hannah Arendt’s perspective. Additionally, the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On the moral permissibility of robot apologies.Makoto Kureha - 2024 - AI and Society 39 (6):2829-2839.
    Robots that incorporate the function of apologizing have emerged in recent years. This paper examines the moral permissibility of making robots apologize. First, I characterize the nature of apology based on analyses conducted in multiple scholarly domains. Next, I present a prima facie argument that robot apologies are not permissible because they may harm human societies by inducing the misattribution of responsibility. Subsequently, I respond to a possible response to the prima facie objection based on the interpretation that attributing responsibility (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Kant-Inspired Indirect Argument for Non-Sentient Robot Rights.Tobias Flattery - 2023 - AI and Ethics.
    Some argue that robots could never be sentient, and thus could never have intrinsic moral status. Others disagree, believing that robots indeed will be sentient and thus will have moral status. But a third group thinks that, even if robots could never have moral status, we still have a strong moral reason to treat some robots as if they do. Drawing on a Kantian argument for indirect animal rights, a number of technology ethicists contend that our treatment of anthropomorphic or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Avatars as Proxies.Paula Sweeney - 2023 - Minds and Machines 33 (3):525-539.
    Avatars will represent us online, in virtual worlds, and in technologically supported hybrid environments. We and our avatars will stand not in an identity relation but in a proxy relation, an arrangement that is significant not least because our proxies’ actions can be counted as our own. However, this proxy relation between humans and avatars is not well understood and its consequences under-explored. In this paper I explore the relation and its potential ethical consequences.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations