Switch to: References

Citations of:

Acts and omissions revisited

Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (4):227-228 (2000)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Safer self-injury or assisted self-harm?Kerry Gutridge - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (1):79-92.
    Psychiatric patients may try (or express a desire) to injure themselves in hospital in order to cope with overwhelming emotional pain. Some health care practitioners and patients propose allowing a controlled amount of self-injury to occur in inpatient facilities, so as to prevent escalation of distress. Is this approach an example of professional assistance with harm? Or, is the approach more likely to minimise harm, by ensuring safer self-injury? In this article, I argue that health care practitioners who use harm-minimisation (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Ethics of Deprescribing in Older Adults.Emily Reeve, Petra Denig, Sarah N. Hilmer & Ruud ter Meulen - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (4):581-590.
    Deprescribing is the term used to describe the process of withdrawal of an inappropriate medication supervised by a clinician. This article presents a discussion of how the Four Principles of biomedical ethics that may guide medical practitioners’ prescribing practices apply to deprescribing medications in older adults. The view of deprescribing as an act creates stronger moral duties than if viewed as an omission. This may explain the fear of negative outcomes which has been reported by prescribers as a barrier to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Positing a difference between acts and omissions: the principle of justice, Rachels' cases and moral weakness.R. Mohindra - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):293-299.
    The difficulty in discovering a difference between killing and letting die has led many philosophers to deny the distinction. This paper seeks to develop an argument defending the distinction between killing and letting die. In relation to Rachels’ cases, the argument is that (a) even accepting that Smith and Jones may select equally heinous options from the choices they have available to them, (b) the fact that the choices available to them are different is morally relevant, and (c) this difference (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Ethics of Deprescribing in Older Adults.Ruud Meulen, Sarah Hilmer, Petra Denig & Emily Reeve - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (4):581-590.
    Deprescribing is the term used to describe the process of withdrawal of an inappropriate medication supervised by a clinician. This article presents a discussion of how the Four Principles of biomedical ethics that may guide medical practitioners’ prescribing practices apply to deprescribing medications in older adults. The view of deprescribing as an act creates stronger moral duties than if viewed as an omission. This may explain the fear of negative outcomes which has been reported by prescribers as a barrier to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation