Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Lifeworld-led Healthcare: Revisiting a Humanising Philosophy that Integrates Emerging Trends. [REVIEW]Les Todres, Kathleen Galvin & Karin Dahlberg - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (1):53-63.
    In this paper, we describe the value and philosophy of lifeworld-led care. Our purpose is to give a philosophically coherent foundation for lifeworld-led care and its core value as a humanising force that moderates technological progress. We begin by indicating the timeliness of these concerns within the current context of citizen-oriented, participative approaches to healthcare. We believe that this context is in need of a deepening philosophy if it is not to succumb to the discourses of mere consumerism. We thus (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • The Limitations of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy and Psychodynamic Therapies of Suicidality from an Existential-Phenomenological Perspective.Gabriel Rossouw - 2007 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 7 (2):1-13.
    Suicidality, a significant problem in New Zealand for the past decade or so, has invited a substantial body of research into causes and prevention. However, given the effort, the prevention results do not appear to be sufficiently convincing when coroners’ views are considered. This paper focuses on two mainstream therapeutic approaches towards persons with borderline personality disorder, in which suicidal behaviour is a prominent feature demanding understanding and active attention. It is argued that dialectical behaviour therapy and psychoanalytically informed therapies (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Lifeworld-led healthcare is more than patient-led care: an existential view of well-being. [REVIEW]Karin Dahlberg, Les Todres & Kathleen Galvin - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (3):265-271.
    In this paper we offer an appreciation and critique of patient-led care as expressed in current policy and practice. We argue that current patient-led approaches hinder a focus on a deeper understanding of what patient-led care could be. Our critique focuses on how the consumerist/citizenship emphasis in current patient-led care obscures attention from a more fundamental challenge to conceptualise an alternative philosophically informed framework from where care can be led. We thus present an alternative interpretation of patient-led care that we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations