Switch to: References

Citations of:

Popper's Analysis of the Problems of Induction and Demarcation and Mises' Justification of the Theoretical Social Sciences

In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen, Rethinking Popper. London: Springer. pp. 161--174 (2009)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Austrian economics without extreme apriorism: construing the fundamental axiom of praxeology as analytic.Alexander Linsbichler - 2021 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 14):3359-3390.
    Current debates between behavioural and orthodox economists indicate that the role and epistemological status of first principles is a particularly pressing problem in economics. As an alleged paragon of extreme apriorism, the methodology of Austrian economics in Mises’ tradition is often dismissed as untenable in the light of modern philosophy. In particular, the defence of the so-called fundamental axiom of praxeology—“Man acts.”—by means of pure intuition is almost unanimously rejected. However, in recently resurfacing debates, the extremeness of Mises’ epistemological position (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • What Rothbard could have done but did not do: The merits of Austrian economics without extreme apriorism.Alexander Linsbichler - 2024 - Philosophical Problems in Science 76:43-84.
    Austrian economics emphasizes a priori components of social scientific theory. Most emphatically, Ludwig Mises and Murray Rothbard champion praxeology, a methodology often criticized as extremely aprioristic. Among the numerous justifications and interpretations of praxeology to be found in the primary and secondary literature, conventionalism avoids the charge of extreme apriorism by construing the fundamental axiom of praxeology as analytic instead of synthetic. This paper (1) explicates the tentative structure of the fundamental axiom, (2) clarifies some aspects of a conventionalist defense (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark