Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Markets or democracy for education? A reply to Stewart Ranson.James Tooley - 1995 - British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1):21-34.
    This paper, which offers a positive assessment of the role of markets in education, is a 'reply' to an earlier contribution to the Journal in which Stewart Ranson argues that markets are intrinsically flawed as a vehicle for improving educational opportunities. The 'reply', among other things, argues that Ranson fails to address the shortcomings of education under democratic control and ignores the educational benefits of authentic markets.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Politics, markets and schools politics, markets and America's schools.James Tooley - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (2):257–264.
    James Tooley; Politics, Markets and Schools Politics, Markets and America’s Schools, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 28, Issue 2, 30 May 2006, Pages.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Markets or democracy for education 1.Stewart Ranson - 1993 - British Journal of Educational Studies 41 (4):333-352.
    This paper critically evaluates the effect of introducing markets into the institutional system of education and promotes the claim of a learning democracy to underpin a richer conception for developing the powers and capacities of all citizens.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • The prisoner's dilemma and educational provision: A reply to Ruth Jonathan.James Tooley - 1992 - British Journal of Educational Studies 40 (2):118-133.
    (1992). The prisoner's dilemma and educational provision: A reply to Ruth Jonathan. British Journal of Educational Studies: Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 118-133.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Public institutions for cooperative action: A reply to James Tooley.Stewart Ranson - 1995 - British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1):35-42.
    This paper challenges the assumptions underpinning James Tooley's earlier critique in this edition of the Journal of the author's negative assessment of market-led forms of educational provision. In particular, the paper highlights Tooley's failure to acknowledge that the pursuit of self-interest within the market place can be self-defeating. The paper concludes by arguing that deliberative public action is a necessary condition for addressing the major predicaments of our time, including those facing education.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The ‘pink‐tank’ on the education reform act.James Tooley - 1992 - British Journal of Educational Studies 40 (4):335-349.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark