Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A dedekind finite borel set.Arnold W. Miller - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (1-2):1-17.
    In this paper we prove three theorems about the theory of Borel sets in models of ZF without any form of the axiom of choice. We prove that if \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${B\subseteq 2^\omega}$$\end{document} is a Gδσ-set then either B is countable or B contains a perfect subset. Second, we prove that if 2ω is the countable union of countable sets, then there exists an Fσδ set \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Łoś's theorem and the axiom of choice.Eleftherios Tachtsis - 2019 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 65 (3):280-292.
    In set theory without the Axiom of Choice (), we investigate the problem of the placement of Łoś's Theorem () in the hierarchy of weak choice principles, and answer several open questions from the book Consequences of the Axiom of Choice by Howard and Rubin, as well as an open question by Brunner. We prove a number of results summarised in § 3.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On o-amorphous sets.P. Creed & J. K. Truss - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):185-226.
    We study a notion of ‘o-amorphous’ which bears the same relationship to ‘o-minimal’ as ‘amorphous’ 191–233) does to ‘strongly minimal’. A linearly ordered set is said to be o-amorphous if its only subsets are finite unions of intervals. This turns out to be a relatively straightforward case, and we can provide a complete ‘classification’, subject to the same provisos as in Truss . The reason is that since o-amorphous is an essentially second-order notion, it corresponds more accurately to 0-categorical o-minimal, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Ramsey’s theorem and König’s Lemma.T. E. Forster & J. K. Truss - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (1):37-42.
    We consider the relation between versions of Ramsey’s Theorem and König’s Infinity Lemma, in the absence of the axiom of choice.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Compact and Loeb Hausdorff spaces in equation image and the axiom of choice for families of finite sets.Kyriakos Keremedis - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (3):130-138.
    Given a set X, equation image denotes the statement: “equation image has a choice set” and equation image denotes the family of all closed subsets of the topological space equation image whose definition depends on a finite subset of X. We study the interrelations between the statements equation image equation image equation image equation image and “equation imagehas a choice set”. We show: equation image iff equation image iff equation image has a choice set iff equation image. equation image iff (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On quasi-amorphous sets.P. Creed & J. K. Truss - 2001 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (8):581-596.
    A set is said to be amorphous if it is infinite, but cannot be written as the disjoint union of two infinite sets. The possible structures which an amorphous set can carry were discussed in [5]. Here we study an analogous notion at the next level up, that is to say replacing finite/infinite by countable/uncountable, saying that a set is quasi-amorphous if it is uncountable, but is not the disjoint union of two uncountable sets, and every infinite subset has a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • On the minimal cover property and certain notions of finite.Eleftherios Tachtsis - 2018 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 57 (5-6):665-686.
    In set theory without the axiom of choice, we investigate the deductive strength of the principle “every topological space with the minimal cover property is compact”, and its relationship with certain notions of finite as well as with properties of linearly ordered sets and partially ordered sets.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Finiteness classes arising from Ramsey-theoretic statements in set theory without choice.Joshua Brot, Mengyang Cao & David Fernández-Bretón - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (6):102961.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The First-Order Structure of Weakly Dedekind-Finite Sets.A. C. Walczak-Typke - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4):1161 - 1170.
    We show that infinite sets whose power-sets are Dedekind-finite can only carry N₀-categorical first order structures. We identify other subclasses of this class of Dedekind-finite sets, and discuss their possible first order structures.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Dedekind-Finite Cardinals Having Countable Partitions.Supakun Panasawatwong & John Kenneth Truss - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-16.
    We study the possible structures which can be carried by sets which have no countable subset, but which fail to be ‘surjectively Dedekind finite’, in two possible senses, that there is surjection to $\omega $, or alternatively, that there is a surjection to a proper superset.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Exclusion Principles as Restricted Permutation Symmetries.S. Tarzi - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (6):955-979.
    We give a derivation of exclusion principles for the elementary particles of the standard model, using simple mathematical principles arising from a set theory of identical particles. We apply the theory of permutation group actions, stating some theorems which are proven elsewhere, and interpreting the results as a heuristic derivation of Pauli's Exclusion Principle (PEP) which dictates the formation of elements in the periodic table and the stability of matter, and also a derivation of quark confinement. We arrive at these (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation